Abstract:Background Radical surgery for colorectal cancer, associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain, needs multimodal analgesia with opioid for analgesia. Despite considerable advancements, the psychological implications and other side effects with opioid remain substantially unresolved. This study aimed to investigate the impact on mood, side effects relative to opioid, and recovery of the patients with hydromorphone or sufentanil intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) in a multimodal perioperative analgesia regimen undergoing radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Methods Eighty patients undergoing elective laparoscopic or open radical surgery for colorectal cancer under general anesthesia were randomized to receive postoperative IV-PCA with either sufentanil (group S) or hydromorphone (group H). All patients received additionally flurbiprofen axetil 50 mg 30 min before the end of surgery and wound infiltration with 10 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine at the end of surgery. The primary endpoint was mood changes at 48 and 96 h after surgery. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of opioid-related adverse effects, recovery results and patient satisfaction after surgery. Results Seventy-two patients completed the study finally. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to preoperative parameters, surgical and anesthetic characteristics ( P > 0.05). No obvious significant differences were observed in VAS score (at rest and during mobilization) and rescue analgesics use ( P > 0.05). Compared with group S, the anger scores in the group H at 48 h and 96 h after surgery were significantly lower ( P = 0.012 and 0.005; respectively), but the incidences of pruritus and nausea were higher ( P = 0.028 and 0.008; respectively). There were no significant differences in the incidences of vomiting, respiratory depression, dizziness, Ramsay score, and hemodynamic changes between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Moreover, there were no significant differences in the time to gastrointestinal recovery, time to drainage tube removal, time to walk, hospital stay after surgery and patient satisfaction between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusions Under the similar analgesia effect with different opoiods postoperatively, hydromorphone IV-PCA resulted in an improved mood, however, a higher occurrence of pruritus and nausea while compared to sufentanil IV-PCA in a multimodal perioperative analgesia regimen. Both regimens of opioid with IV-PCA may serve as promising candidates for good postoperative pain management, and provide with similar postoperative recovery for the patients undergoing radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Trial registration This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on September 20, 2015 (URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn . Registry number: ChiCTR-IPR-15007112).

Patient-controlled analgesia and sedation with alfentanyl versus fentanyl for colonoscopy: a randomized double blind study

Remifentanil vs. meperidine for patient-controlled analgesia during colonoscopy: a randomized double-blind trial

Prospective investigation of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with hydromorphone or sufentanil: impact on mood, opioid adverse effects, and recovery

Evaluation on postoperative analgesia efficacy of oxycodone combined with dexmedetomidine in patients underwent laparoscopic radical surgery of colon cancer

Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol in Combination with Fentanyl for Sedation-Analgesia in Colonoscopy Procedures: A Randomized Prospective Study

Two dosages of remifentanil for patient-controlled analgesia vs. meperidine during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Midazolam and pethidine versus propofol and fentanyl patient controlled sedation/analgesia for upper gastrointestinal tract ultrasound endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Randomized and controlled study comparing patient controlled and radiologist controlled intra-procedural conscious sedation, using midazolam and fentanyl, for patients undergoing insertion of a central venous line

Assessment of pain between sedated and unsedated colonoscopy: Double-blind randomized clinical trail

Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Versus Propofol as Anesthetic for Patients Undergoing Painless Colonoscopy

Sedation and Safety of Propofol for Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Of Patient-Controlled Sedation Versus Intravenous Sedation For Colonoscopy

Comparison of Fentanyl, Ketamine, and Lidocaine Combined with Propofol Anesthesia in Patients with Crohn Disease Undergoing Colonoscopy

Comparison of Synergistic Sedation with Midazolam and Propofol Versus Midazolam and Pethidine in Colonoscopies: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study

Optimal concentrations of sufentanil and fentanyl for postoperative subcutaneous analgesia

Analgesic anesthesia with fentanyl (F) and sufentanil (SF) in coronary surgery. A double blind study

Efficacy Of An Oxycodone-Propofol Combination Versus A Fentanyl-Propofol Combination In Conscious Sedation During Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography In Elderly Patients

Comparison of anesthetic effects of different doses of alfentanil combined with ciprofol in elderly patients undergoing ERCP: a randomized controlled trial

The efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial

Efficacy Comparison of Fentanyl and Oxycodone-Acetaminophen in Old Patients with Painless Colonoscopy under Propofol Anesthesia

Addition of Low-Dose Ketamine to Propofol-Fentanyl Sedation for Gynecologic Diagnostic Laparoscopy: Randomized Controlled Trial