The link between countries' economic and scientific wealth has a complex dependence on technological activity and research policy

Alonso Rodriguez-Navarro,Ricardo Brito
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.14522
2021-12-29
Abstract:We studied the research performance of 69 countries by considering two different types of new knowledge: incremental (normal) and fundamental (radical). In principle, these two types of new knowledge should be assessed at two very different levels of citations, but we demonstrate that a simpler assessment can be performed based on the total number of papers (P) and the ratio of the number of papers in the global top 10% of most cited papers divided to the total number of papers (Ptop 10%/P). P represents the quantity, whereas the Ptop 10%/P ratio represents the efficiency. In ideal countries, P and the Ptop 10%/P ratio are linked to the gross domestic product (GDP) and GDP the per capita, respectively. Only countries with high Ptop 10%/P ratios participate actively in the creation of fundamental new knowledge and have Noble laureates. In real countries, the link between economic and scientific wealth can be modified by the technological activity and the research policy. We discuss how technological activity may decrease the Ptop 10%/P ratio while only slightly affecting the capacity to create fundamental new knowledge; in such countries, many papers may report incremental innovations that do not drive the advancement of knowledge. Japan is the clearest example of this, although there are many less extreme examples. Independently of technological activity, research policy has a strong influence on the Ptop 10%/P ratio, which may be higher or lower than expected from the GDP per capita depending on the success of the research policy.
Digital Libraries
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the independent impacts of economic wealth and research policies on a country's ability to create new knowledge. Specifically, the authors studied the differences in scientific research performance among 69 countries, especially these countries' abilities in creating incremental (routine) and fundamental (revolutionary) new knowledge. By analyzing the total number of papers (P) in different countries and the proportion of these papers that are among the top 10% of global citations (Ptop 10%/P), the authors aim to reveal the complex relationship between economic wealth and scientific research output, and explore how technological activities and research policies affect this relationship. In addition, the paper also discusses the phenomenon that technological activities may reduce the Ptop 10%/P ratio while having less impact on the ability to create fundamental new knowledge, and how research policies significantly affect this ratio, even among countries with similar economic levels.