Reflections on the future of machine learning for materials research

Naohiro Fujinuma,Brian L. DeCost,Jason Hattrick-Simpers,Samuel E. Lofland
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.09764
2021-12-18
Abstract:Applied machine learning (ML) has rapidly spread throughout the physical sciences; in fact, ML-based data analysis and experimental decision-making has become commonplace. We suggest a shift in the conversation from proving that ML can be used to evaluating how to equitably and effectively implement ML for <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://science.We" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> advocate a shift from a "more data, more compute" mentality to a model-oriented approach that prioritizes using machine learning to support the ecosystem of computational models and experimental <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://measurements.We" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> also recommend an open conversation about dataset bias to stabilize productive research through careful model interrogation and deliberate exploitation of known biases. Further, we encourage the community to develop ML methods that connect experiments with theoretical models to increase scientific understanding rather than incrementally optimizing materials. Moreover we envision a future of radical materials innovations enabled by computational creativity tools combined with online visualization and analysis tools that support active outside-the-box thinking inside the scientific knowledge feedback loop. Finally, as a community we must acknowledge ethical issues that can arise from blindly following machine learning predictions and the issues of social equity that will arise if data, code, and computational resources are not readily available to all.
Materials Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?