Abstract:Motivation: Social media platforms centered around content creators (CCs) faced rapid growth in the past decade. Currently, millions of CCs make livable incomes through platforms such as YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram. As such, similarly to the job market, it is important to ensure the success and income (usually related to the follower counts) of CCs reflect the quality of their work. Since quality cannot be observed directly, two other factors govern the network-formation process: (a) the visibility of CCs (resulted from, e.g., recommender systems and moderation processes) and (b) the decision-making process of seekers (i.e., of users focused on finding CCs). Prior virtual experiments and empirical work seem contradictory regarding fairness: While the first suggests the expected number of followers of CCs reflects their quality, the second says that quality does not perfectly predict success. Results: Our paper extends prior models in order to bridge this gap between theoretical and empirical work. We (a) define a parameterized recommendation process which allocates visibility based on popularity biases, (b) define two metrics of individual fairness (ex-ante and ex-post), and (c) define a metric for seeker satisfaction. Through an analytical approach we show our process is an absorbing Markov Chain where exploring only the most popular CCs leads to lower expected times to absorption but higher chances of unfairness for CCs. While increasing the exploration helps, doing so only guarantees fair outcomes for the highest (and lowest) quality CC. Simulations revealed that CCs and seekers prefer different algorithmic designs: CCs generally have higher chances of fairness with anti-popularity biased recommendation processes, while seekers are more satisfied with popularity-biased recommendations. Altogether, our results suggest that while the exploration of low-popularity CCs is needed to improve fairness, platforms might not have the incentive to do so and such interventions do not entirely prevent unfair outcomes.

Creativity in social networks is enhanced by 'Goldilocks' dispersal of ideators' visibility

Creativity in temporal social networks: How divergent thinking is impacted by one's choice of peers

Creativity and Social Alienation: the Costs of Being Creative

Creative webs: decoding the creativity potential of Twitter followers

AI Can Enhance Creativity in Social Networks

Cues to gender and racial identity reduce creativity in diverse social networks

Exploring Optimal Combinations: the Impact of Sequential Multimodal Inspirational Stimuli in Design Concepts on Creativity.

Capturing the Production of the Innovative Ideas: An Online Social Network Experiment and "Idea Geography" Visualization

Disentangling the relations among help‐givers' instrumental helping ties, creativity, and creative idea implementation: A social network perspective

Effects of Network Connectivity and Functional Diversity Distribution on Human Collective Ideation

“Who are you going to call?” Network activation in creative idea generation and elaboration

Supporting Crowd Workers in Ideation Tasks Through Information Gathering and Reflective Activity

A Network View of Advice-giving and Individual Creativity in Teams: A Brokerage-driven, Socially Perpetuated Phenomenon

Directed Diversity: Leveraging Language Embedding Distances for Collective Creativity in Crowd Ideation

The Social Benefits of Balancing Creativity and Imitation: Evidence from an Agent-based Model

The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: A comprehensive examination and extension.

The Boon and Bane of Creative “Stars”: A Social Network Exploration of How and When Team Creativity Is (and Is Not) Driven by a Star Teammate

Measuring Team Creativity Through Longitudinal Social Signals

Creativity at Rest: Exploring Functional Network Connectivity of Creative Experts

How Others Light the Creative Spark: Low Power Accentuates the Benefits of Diversity for Individual Inspiration and Creativity

The role of luck in the success of social media influencers