Abstract:Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) methods are playing an increasingly important role in the pricing of complex financial derivatives. For models in which the prices of the underlying assets are driven by Brownian motions, the performance of QMC methods is known to depend crucially on the construction of Brownian motions. This paper focuses on the impact of various constructions. Although the Brownian bridge (BB) construction often yields very good results, as Papageorgiou pointed out, there are financial derivatives for which the BB construction performs badly [Papageorgiou, A. 2002. The Brownian bridge does not offer a consistent advantage in quasi-Monte Carlo integration. J. Complexity18(1) 171--186]. In this paper we first extend Papageorgiou's analysis to establish an equivalence principle: if the BB construction (or any other construction) is the preferred construction for a particular financial derivative, then for any other construction, there is another financial derivative for which the latter construction is the preferred one. In this sense, all methods of construction are equivalent and no method is consistently superior to others; it all depends on the particular financial derivative. We then show how to find a good construction for a particular class of financial derivatives. In practice, our strategy is to find a good construction for an “easy” problem and then apply it to more complicated problems related to the easy one. This strategy is applied to the arithmetic Asian options (including Bermudan Asian options) based on the weighted average of the stock prices. We do this by studying a simpler problem, namely, the geometric Asian option, for which the best construction is easily available, and applying it to the arithmetic Asian option. Numerical experiments confirm the success of this strategy: whereas in QMC all the common methods (the standard method, BB, and principal component analysis) may lose their power in some situations, the new method behaves very well in all cases. Further large variance reduction can be achieved in combination with a control variate. The new method can be interpreted as a practical way of reducing the effective dimension for some class of functions.

Efficient ISDA Initial Margin Calculations Using Least Squares Monte-Carlo

Dynamic sensitivities and Initial Margin via Chebyshev Tensors

A static replication approach for callable interest rate derivatives: mathematical foundations and efficient estimation of SIMM–MVA

A closed form model-free approximation for the Initial Margin of option portfolios

On Deep Learning for computing the Dynamic Initial Margin and Margin Value Adjustment

Quasi-Monte Carlo Simulation for American Option Sensitivities

Finite Difference Solution Ansatz approach in Least-Squares Monte Carlo

Simulation of Derivatives Post-Trade Services using an Authoritative Data Store and the ISDA Common Domain Model

Margin Calculation of Multi-Leg Option Strategies

CCP Cleared or Bilateral CSA Trades with Initial/Variation Margins under credit, funding and wrong-way risks: A Unified Valuation Approach

Distributed Least-Squares Monte Carlo for American Option Pricing

An Integral Equation Approach for the Valuation of Finite-maturity margin-call Stock Loans

Counter-cyclical Margins for Option Portfolios

An Active Margin System and its Application in Chinese Margin Lending Market

Dynamic margin optimization

Efficient calibration of the shifted square-root diffusion model to credit default swap spreads using asymptotic approximations

PDE formulation of some SABR/LIBOR market models and its numerical solution with a sparse grid combination technique

Numerical approximations of McKean Anticipative Backward Stochastic Differential Equations arising in Initial Margin requirements

Decentralised Finance and Automated Market Making: Execution and Speculation

Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering: An Equivalence Principle and Dimension Reduction

A Front Fixing Implicit Finite Difference Method for the American Put Options Model