Defining "Giant" Electrostriction

Jiacheng Yu,Pierre-Eymeric Janolin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0079510

2022-02-22

Abstract:The recent discovery of giant electrostrictors has re-ignited the interest in electrostriction, an electromechanical coupling existing in all dielectrics but overshadowed by its linear counterpart: piezoelectricity. In this review, after a reminder of classical electrostriction, we propose a definition of giant electrostriction based on two empirical relations (Newnam relation and one we propose). From this definition, we review previous reports on giant electrostrictors, to assess their nature. Focusing on the ones satisfying our definition, we compare their performances and characteristics. We also identify some of the hurdles to their adoption in the wide range of electromechanical applications, despite their fundamental and applicative interests.

Materials Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problems that this paper attempts to solve are to define and quantify the "giant electrostriction" effect, and to evaluate whether the reported "giant electrostriction" materials truly meet this definition. Specifically:

1. **Defining "giant electrostriction"**: The author proposes a method to define "giant electrostriction" based on two empirical relationships (the Newnam relationship and another relationship proposed by themselves). These relationships help to distinguish ordinary electrostriction materials from those showing an abnormally large response.

2. **Evaluating the reported "giant electrostriction" materials**: According to the proposed definition, the author reviews the previously reported "giant electrostriction" materials and evaluates whether they truly meet the criteria of "giant electrostriction". This includes comparing the performance and characteristics of these materials.

3. **Identifying application barriers**: Although "giant electrostriction" materials have great potential for application in theory, the author also points out the challenges in applying these materials to a wide range of electromechanical systems.

### Core issues of the paper

- **How to define "giant electrostriction"?**
- The author defines "giant electrostriction" through two empirical formulas:
\[
|Q_h| \approx 2.37 \left( \frac{s}{\epsilon_0 \epsilon_r} \right)^{0.59}
\]
\[
|M| \approx 10^4 (s \epsilon_0 \epsilon_r)^{1.14}
\]
where \( Q_h \) is the hydrostatic electrostriction coefficient, \( M \) is the electric - field electrostriction coefficient, \( s \) is the elastic compliance, \( \epsilon_0 \) is the vacuum permittivity, and \( \epsilon_r \) is the relative permittivity.

- **Which materials truly meet the criteria of "giant electrostriction"?**
- The author screens out materials that truly exhibit the "giant electrostriction" effect through the above - defined method, such as Gd - doped CeO₂, Nb - Y - stabilized Bi₂O₃, LAMOX, etc.

- **Application prospects and challenges**
- Although "giant electrostriction" materials have excellent electromechanical properties, their wide - spread application still faces some challenges, such as material stability, frequency response and other issues.

Through the answers to these questions, the author hopes to provide a clear standard and direction for future research and applications, thereby promoting the further development of electrostriction materials in fields such as sensors and actuators.