Abstract:Law at large underpins modern society, codifying and governing many aspects of citizens' daily lives. Oftentimes, law is subject to interpretation, debate and challenges throughout various courts and jurisdictions. But in some other areas, law leaves little room for interpretation, and essentially aims to rigorously describe a computation, a decision procedure or, simply said, an algorithm. Unfortunately, prose remains a woefully inadequate tool for the job. The lack of formalism leaves room for ambiguities; the structure of legal statutes, with many paragraphs and sub-sections spread across multiple pages, makes it hard to compute the intended outcome of the algorithm underlying a given text; and, as with any other piece of poorly-specified critical software, the use of informal language leaves corner cases unaddressed. We introduce Catala, a new programming language that we specifically designed to allow a straightforward and systematic translation of statutory law into an executable implementation. Catala aims to bring together lawyers and programmers through a shared medium, which together they can understand, edit and evolve, bridging a gap that often results in dramatically incorrect implementations of the law. We have implemented a compiler for Catala, and have proven the correctness of its core compilation steps using the F* proof assistant. We evaluate Catala on several legal texts that are algorithms in disguise, notably section 121 of the US federal income tax and the byzantine French family benefits; in doing so, we uncover a bug in the official implementation. We observe as a consequence of the formalization process that using Catala enables rich interactions between lawyers and programmers, leading to a greater understanding of the original legislative intent, while producing a correct-by-construction executable specification reusable by the greater software ecosystem.

Pacta sunt servanda: legal contracts in Stipula

From Legal Contracts to Legal Calculi: the code-driven normativity

Contracts in Practice

Conversion of Legal Agreements into Smart Legal Contracts using NLP

From Legal Contracts to Formal Specifications: A Systematic Literature Review

Languages for Smart and Computable Contracts

LAW: Legal Agentic Workflows for Custody and Fund Services Contracts

Pacti: Scaling Assume-Guarantee Reasoning for System Analysis and Design

A Practical System Architecture for Contract Automation: Design and Uses

A Software Tool for Legal Drafting

Isyn: Semi-automated Smart Contract Synthesis from Legal Financial Agreements

Automated legal reasoning with discretion to act using s(LAW)

An empirical analysis of smart contracts: platforms, applications, and design patterns

Specification is Law: Safe Creation and Upgrade of Ethereum Smart Contracts

Smart Contract Languages: a comparative analysis

Towards Mitigating Perceived Unfairness in Contracts from a Non-Legal Stakeholder's Perspective

Paradigm Shift from Paper Contracts to Smart Contracts

Invited Paper: Beagle: A New Framework for Smart Contracts Taking Account of Law

Smart Contract Templates: essential requirements and design options

Smart Contracts: A Requiem

Catala: A Programming Language for the Law