Abstract:Social influence pervades our everyday lives and lays the foundation for complex social phenomena. In a crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic, social influence can determine whether life-saving information is adopted. Existing literature studying online social influence suffers from several drawbacks. First, a disconnect appears between psychology approaches, which are generally performed and tested in controlled lab experiments, and the quantitative methods, which are usually data-driven and rely on network and event analysis. The former are slow, expensive to deploy, and typically do not generalize well to topical issues (such as an ongoing pandemic); the latter often oversimplify the complexities of social influence and ignore psychosocial literature. This work bridges this gap and presents three contributions towards modeling and empirically quantifying online influence. The first contribution is a data-driven Generalized Influence Model that incorporates two novel psychosocial-inspired mechanisms: the conductance of the diffusion network and the social capital distribution. The second contribution is a framework to empirically rank users' social influence using a human-in-the-loop active learning method combined with crowdsourced pairwise influence comparisons. We build a human-labeled ground truth, calibrate our generalized influence model and perform a large-scale evaluation of influence. We find that our generalized model outperforms the current state-of-the-art approaches and corrects the inherent biases introduced by the widely used follower count. As the third contribution, we apply the influence model to discussions around COVID-19. We quantify users' influence, and we tabulate it against their professions. We find that the executives, media, and military are more influential than pandemic-related experts such as life scientists and healthcare professionals.

Influencing the Influencers: Evaluating Person-to-Person Influence on Social Networks Using Granger Causality

Influence Estimation on Social Media Networks Using Causal Inference

Analyzing X's Web of Influence: Dissecting News Sharing Dynamics through Credibility and Popularity with Transfer Entropy and Multiplex Network Measures

Towards a Better Understanding of Online Influence: Differences in Twitter CommunicationBetween Companies and Influencers

Quantifying Influencer Impact on Affective Polarization

Conductance and Social Capital: Modeling and Empirically Measuring Online Social Influence

A multilayered graph-based framework to explore behavioural phenomena in social media conversations

An Exploratory Study of Twitter Metrics for Measuring User Influence

Investigating Coordinated 'Social' Targeting of High-Profile Twitter Accounts

Finding the Tipping Point: When Heterogeneous Evaluations in Social Media Converge and Influence Organizational Legitimacy

Social Convos: Capturing Agendas and Emotions on Social Media

AI-Driven Influencer Marketing: Comparing the Effects of Virtual and Human Influencers on Consumer Perceptions

Identifying and characterizing superspreaders of low-credibility content on Twitter

Meta‐analysis of social media influencer impact: Key antecedents and theoretical foundations

More spreaders but less influence : An analysis of indirect influence on Twitter

Modeling Indirect Influence on Twitter

The Anatomy Spread of Online Opinion Polarization: The Pivotal Role of Super-Spreaders in Social Networks

Keeping it Authentic: The Social Footprint of the Trolls Network

What Drives Virtual Influencer's Impact?

Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections

The influence of coordinated behavior on toxicity