Something is wrong in the state of QED

Oliver Consa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.02078

2021-10-04

Abstract:Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is considered the most accurate theory in the history of science. However, this precision is based on a single experimental value: the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron (g-factor). An examination of the history of QED reveals that this value was obtained in a very suspicious way. These suspicions include the case of Karplus & Kroll, who admitted to having lied in their presentation of the most relevant calculation in the history of QED. As we will demonstrate in this paper, the Karplus & Kroll affair was not an isolated case, but one in a long series of errors, suspicious coincidences, mathematical inconsistencies and renormalized infinities swept under the rug.

General Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to solve the credibility problem in the theory of quantum electrodynamics (QED). Specifically, the author Oliver Consa points out that QED is regarded as one of the most accurate theories in the history of science, but this accuracy mainly depends on a single experimental value of the electron anomalous magnetic moment (g - factor). In the paper, Consa reveals that there are many suspicious aspects in the process of obtaining this experimental value, including Karplus and Kroll admitting to lying in a crucial calculation in the history of QED. In addition, the paper also explores other errors, suspicious coincidences, mathematical inconsistencies, and the covered - up infinity problems in the development of QED. Through these analyses, the author questions the reliability of the QED theory and its position in the history of science.

The core issue of the paper is to question whether the establishment of the QED theory is based on reliable data and methods, especially the legality of the renormalization techniques used when dealing with the infinity problem. Consa believes that these techniques and methods may cover up fundamental problems in the theory, resulting in the QED theory, although highly consistent with experimental data, may have an unstable foundation.