Abstract:Detecting promising technology groups for recombination holds the promise of great value for R&D managers and technology policymakers, especially if the technologies in question can be detected before they have been combined. However, predicting the future is always easier said than done. In this regard, Arthur’s theory (The nature of technology: what it is and how it evolves, Free Press, New York, 2009) on the nature of technologies and how science evolves, coupled with Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions (Kuhn in The structure of scientific revolutions, 1st edn, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p 3, 1962), may serve as the basis of a shrewd methodological framework for forecasting recombinative innovation. These theories help us to set out quantifiable criteria and decomposable steps to identify research patterns at each stage of a scientific revolution. The first step in the framework is to construct a conceptual model of the target technology domain, which helps to refine a reasonable search strategy. With the model built, the landscape of a field—its communities, its technologies, and their interactions—is fleshed out through community detection and network analysis based on a set of quantifiable criteria. The aim is to map normal patterns of research in the domain under study so as to highlight which technologies might contribute to a structural deepening of technological recombinations. Probability analysis helps to detect and group candidate technologies for possible recombination and further manual analysis by experts. To demonstrate how the framework works in practice, we conducted an empirical study on AI research in China. We explored the development potential of recombinative technologies by zooming in on the top patent assignees in the field and their innovations. In conjunction with expert analysis, the results reveal the cooperative and competitive relationships among these technology holders and opportunities for future innovation through technological recombinations.

Which will be your firm's next technology? Comparison between machine learning and network-based algorithms

A new mapping of technological interdependence

Technological similarity and stock return cross-predictability: Evidence from patents’ big data

The survival of start-ups in time of crisis. A machine learning approach to measure innovation

Uncovering key predictors of high-growth firms via explainable machine learning

Data-Driven Intelligence on Innovation and Competition: Patent Overlay Network Visualization and Analytics.

Exploring Firms' Innovation Capabilities Through Learning Systems

Technological interdependencies predict innovation dynamics

Mapping technological innovation dynamics in artificial intelligence domains: Evidence from a global patent analysis

A Hybrid Approach to Detecting Technological Recombination Based on Text Mining and Patent Network Analysis.

From technology opportunities to solutions generation via patent analysis: Application of machine learning-based link prediction

Prediction of Emerging Technologies Based on Analysis of the U.S. Patent Citation Network

Patent Network Analysis for Identifying Technological Evolution: A Case Study of China's Artificial Intelligence Technologies

Discovery of factors influencing patent value based on machine learning in patents in the field of nanotechnology

Identifying Emerging Technologies and Leading Companies using Network Dynamics of Patent Clusters: a Cybersecurity Case Study

Assessing future technological impacts of patents based on the classification algorithms in machine learning: The case of electric vehicle domain

Predictive modeling for technology convergence: A patent data-driven approach through technology topic networks

Network Structural Analysis of Technology: a Study from Patent Perspective

Forecasting stock market trend: a comparison of machine learning algorithms

Predicting Economic Trends and Stock Market Prices with Deep Learning and Advanced Machine Learning Techniques

How Do Heterogeneous Networks Affect a Firm's Innovation Performance? A Research Analysis Based on Clustering and Classification