Abstract:There have been recent arguments against the idea that substructural solutions are uniform. The claim is that even if the substructuralist solves the common semantic paradoxes uniformly by targeting Cut or Contraction, with additional machinery, we can construct higher-level paradoxes (e.g., a higher-level Liar, a higher-level Curry, and a meta-validity Curry). These higher-level paradoxes do not use metainferential Cut or Contraction, but rather, higher-level Cuts and higher-level Contractions. These kinds of paradoxes suggest that targeting Cut or Contraction is not enough for solving semantic paradoxes; the substructuralist must target Cut of every level or Contraction of every level to solve the paradoxes. Hence, the substructuralists do not provide as uniform of a solution as they hoped they did. In response, we argue that the substructuralists need not admit these additional machineries. In fact, they are redundant in light of the validity predicate (i.e., there is no gain in terms of expressive power). The validity predicate is powerful enough to creep these paradoxes in the object level. The substructuralist does not need to ascend to metainferences to construct higher-level paradoxes. Moreover, there is a reading available to the substructuralist such that all the higher-level structural rules would collapse to instances of the object-level structural rules (e.g., meta Cut and meta Contraction would become instances of Cut and Contraction). We then address Barrio et al.'s worry that the validity predicate has its shortcomings; the substructuralist cannot internalize some of its metarules. We claim that the validity of metarules can be internalized without the need to strengthen the validity predicate. However, a problem raised by Barrio et al. is still present—the problem of internalizing unwanted instances of Cut in Cut-free approaches. We argue that this internalization problem is not unique to the validity predicate; the same problem is present with other problematic predicates, such as the truth predicate and the provability predicate.

Substructural fixed-point theorems and the diagonal argument: theme and variations

Semi-Substructural Logics with Additives

On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. A correction and extension to Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method.

Tarski's Undefinability Theorem and Diagonal Lemma

The Jacobson Radical of a Propositional Theory

From Lawvere to Brandenburger-Keisler: interactive forms of diagonalization and self-reference

Sub-sub-intuitionistic logic

Higher-Level Paradoxes and Substructural Solutions

Abstract Effects and Proof-Relevant Logical Relations

How to be a structuralist all the way down

Axiomatization of Boolean algebras via weak dicomplementations

Diagonals and Block-Ordered Relations

Di-Exact Categories and Lattices of Normal Subobjects

Proof-theoretic methods in quantifier-free definability

An isomorphism theorem for models of weak König’s lemma without primitive recursion

Minimal Predicates, Fixed-Points, and Definability

Stone duality, topological algebra, and recognition

A generalization of de Vries duality to closed relations between compact Hausdorff spaces

Logic-based analogical proportions

On Language Varieties Without Boolean Operations

Enriched structure-semantics adjunctions and monad-theory equivalences for subcategories of arities