Comparing Knowledge Acquisition and Retention Between Mobile Learning and Traditional Learning in Teaching Respiratory Therapy Students: A Randomized Control Trial
Bshayer Ramadan Alhamad,Sajida Agha
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S390794
2023-04-07
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Abstract:Bshayer Ramadan Alhamad, 1, 2 Sajida Agha 3, 4 1 Department of Respiratory Therapy, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia; 2 King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia; 3 Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 4 King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Correspondence: Bshayer Ramadan Alhamad, Department of Respiratory Therapy, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, P. O. Box 2477, Al Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia, Tel +96613 562900, Ext 29282, Email Purpose: Mobile learning (m-learning) is one of the trends in health professions' education. It has a promising future in education, but it also presents various challenges and risks. This research seeks to highlight some of the greatest accomplishments, opportunities, and issues related to m-Learning in teaching and learning. We believe the findings help us maximize the positive effects of m-Learning while minimizing any potential drawbacks associated with the technological changes taking place in education. The study aimed to compare respiratory therapy students' knowledge acquisition and retention between using m-learning and traditional learning. Participants and Methods: Randomized pre-test, post-test, control group design was used. All 3rd year (N = 46) respiratory therapy students in one governmental university in Saudi Arabia were randomly assigned to either intervention or control group. Both groups took the same content of arterial blood gas lecture for 2 hours. The intervention group took the lecture using m-learning; two mobile apps: (1) ABG Book, (2) Arterial Blood Gas (Lite). The traditional learning (lecture-based learning) was used for the control group. The same test was conducted before, immediately after, and two weeks after the lecture. The duration of the test was 30 minutes. The data were analyzed using independent t -test and repeated measured ANOVA using p < 0.05. IRB Approval was obtained. Results: Forty-five students participated. Although no statistically significant difference was found on knowledge acquisition and retention between the two types of learning (p = 0.305, p = 0.904, respectively), it was found among the three time-points within each group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Both m-learning and traditional learning are effective in increasing knowledge acquisition and retention. However, no one is better than the other. Further researches were needed with larger sample size through multi-institutional studies to validate the results of this study. Keywords: education, knowledge, acquisition, learning, teaching, respiratory therapy The twenty-first century has shown a major shift in technological applications through all sectors, including teaching and learning. 1 The use of mobile devices is the leading technological advancement of the century; where according to worldometer, there were 7.33 billion mobile devices in use by the start of February 2023 against the global population of 8 billion people, showing a high penetration rate. 2 Mobile devices have influenced a shift in learning techniques such as mobile learning (M-Learning). M-learning is a subset of electronic learning and is considered the latest type of learning introduced as a result of the technological revolution. 1 When reviewing the literature, one can find many definitions for M-learning. However, the most common cited one, defined M-learning as an any sort of learning that happens when the learner is not at a fixed, predetermined location, or learning that happens when the learner takes advantage of the learning opportunities offered by mobile technologies. 3 Today, learners can use technological developments, such as tablet personal computers and smartphones to access learning resources, gain knowledge, and sharing information. Learners can access the educational contents when using the mobile through two main resources: applications and social media. Mobile applications consist of a software/set of programs that runs on a mobile device and perform certain tasks for the user. 3 According to a study, system, intention, and user satisfaction were revealed to positively and significantly influence the use of M-learning systems. 4 Literature has reported that m-learning tends to increase the interest in learning among students. This factor can promote the acquisition and retention of knowledge compared to traditional learning. Wilkinson and Barter<s -Abstract Truncated-