Abstract:Children achieve better long‐term language outcomes than adults. However, it remains unclear whether children actually learn language more quickly than adults during real‐time exposure to input—indicative of true superior language learning abilities—or whether this advantage stems from other factors. To examine this issue, we compared the rate at which children (8–10 years) and adults extracted a novel, hidden linguistic rule, in which novel articles probabilistically predicted the animacy of associated nouns (e.g., "gi lion"). Participants categorized these two‐word phrases according to a second, explicitly instructed rule over two sessions, separated by an overnight delay. Both children and adults successfully learned the hidden animacy rule through mere exposure to the phrases, showing slower response times and decreased accuracy to occasional phrases that violated the rule. Critically, sensitivity to the hidden rule emerged much more quickly in children than adults; children showed a processing cost for violation trials from very early on in learning, whereas adults did not show reliable sensitivity to the rule until the second session. Children also showed superior generalization of the hidden animacy rule when asked to classify nonword trials (e.g., "gi badupi") according to the hidden animacy rule. Children and adults showed similar retention of the hidden rule over the delay period. These results provide insight into the nature of the critical period for language, suggesting that children have a true advantage over adults in the rate of implicit language learning. Relative to adults, children more rapidly extract hidden linguistic structures during real‐time language exposure. Research Highlights Children and adults both succeeded in implicitly learning a novel, uninstructed linguistic rule, based solely on exposure to input. Children learned the novel linguistic rules much more quickly than adults. Children showed better generalization performance than adults when asked to apply the novel rule to nonsense words without semantic content. Results provide insight into the nature of critical period effects in language, indicating that children have an advantage over adults in real‐time language learning.

Age affects chunk-based, but not rule-based learning in artificial grammar acquisition

Developmental changes in brain activation during novel grammar learning in 8-25-year-olds

Adult age differences in the benefit of syntactic and semantic constraints for sentence processing.

Age Effects in L2 Grammar Processing as Revealed by ERPs and How (Not) to Study Them

Neural Basis of the Implicit Learning of Complex Artificial Grammar with Nonadjacent Dependencies

Relationship between perceptual learning in speech and statistical learning in younger and older adults

Effects of Focus on Forms and Focus on Form Instruction on Middle-Aged and Elderly Learners’ English Grammar Acquisition

Age differences in context use during reading and downstream effects on recognition memory

Assessing processing-based measures of implicit statistical learning: Three serial reaction time experiments do not reveal artificial grammar learning

Can adults learn L2 grammar after prolonged exposure under incidental conditions?

Visual artificial grammar learning across 1 year in 7-year-olds and adults

Implicit and explicit second language training recruit common neural mechanisms for syntactic processing

Input and Age-Dependent Variation in Second Language Learning: A Connectionist Account

Children extract a new linguistic rule more quickly than adults

Syntactic flexibility and lexical encoding in aging sentence production: an eye tracking study

A Matter of Memory? Age‐Invariant Relative Clause Disambiguation and Memory Interference in Older Adults

An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing

Effects of age and training on memory for pragmatic implications in advertising

Age effects in second language acquisition: Expanding the emergentist account

Age Differences in the Recruitment of Syntactic Analysis and Semantic Plausibility During Sentence Comprehension.

Aging and individual differences in binding during sentence understanding: evidence from temporary and global syntactic attachment ambiguities