Abstract:The increasing availability of brain data within and outside the biomedical field, combined with the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to brain data analysis, poses a challenge for ethics and governance. We identify distinctive ethical implications of brain data acquisition and processing, and outline a multi-level governance framework. This framework is aimed at maximizing the benefits of facilitated brain data collection and further processing for science and medicine whilst minimizing risks and preventing harmful use. The framework consists of four primary areas of regulatory intervention: binding regulation, ethics and soft law, responsible innovation, and human rights.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the challenges to ethics and governance brought by the increasing availability of brain data both within and outside the biomedical field and the application of artificial intelligence technology in brain data analysis. Specifically, the authors identify the unique ethical implications of brain data acquisition and processing and propose a multi - level governance framework, aiming to maximize the benefits of brain data collection and further processing for science and medicine while minimizing risks and preventing harmful use. The paper points out that the wide use of brain data is not limited to clinical medicine and biomedical research, but also extends to non - medical fields such as employment, education, the military, and even for personal use through consumer - grade devices. These new ways of using brain data increase the need for data governance, especially in the following aspects: 1. **Law and Regulation**: Currently, there is a lack of a mandatory governance framework specifically for brain data, especially at the transnational and international law levels. Although brain data is regarded as personal data and protected, the difficulty of anonymization and the possibility of re - identification make it difficult for existing data protection regulations (such as the General Data Protection Regulation in the EU) to fully cope with the special nature of brain data. 2. **Ethics and Soft Law**: Existing biomedical or clinical research ethics guidelines are not applicable to the collection and processing of brain data in the consumer, neuromarketing, workplace or military fields. Therefore, new ethical guidelines are needed to fill the gaps in data governance. 3. **Responsible Innovation**: Most applications that collect and process brain data outside of clinical and medical research do not comply with EU medical device regulations or obtain approval from the US Food and Drug Administration. This has led to problems with data quality and safety, as well as the potential risks of bias and misleading information. 4. **Human Rights**: There are no clear provisions in the international human rights framework to protect individual rights from the impact of brain data collection and use. In particular, regarding the dual use of brain data or the potential militarization of weapons, there is currently a lack of specific international treaties. To solve these problems, the authors propose a multi - level governance framework, including four main areas of regulatory intervention: mandatory regulations, ethics and soft law, responsible innovation, and human rights protection. This framework aims to balance the relationship between the value of brain data in scientific research and medical applications and ethical and legal risks.

Towards a Governance Framework for Brain Data