Abstract:Completely randomized experiments have been the gold standard for drawing causal inference because they can balance all potential confounding on average. However, they may suffer from unbalanced covariates for realized treatment assignments. Rerandomization, a design that rerandomizes the treatment assignment until a prespecified covariate balance criterion is met, has recently got attention due to its easy implementation, improved covariate balance and more efficient inference. Researchers have then suggested to use the treatment assignments that minimize the covariate imbalance, namely the optimally balanced design. This has caused again the long-time controversy between two philosophies for designing experiments: randomization versus optimal and thus almost deterministic designs. Existing literature argued that rerandomization with overly balanced observed covariates can lead to highly imbalanced unobserved covariates, making it vulnerable to model misspecification. On the contrary, rerandomization with properly balanced covariates can provide robust inference for treatment effects while sacrificing some efficiency compared to the ideally optimal design. In this paper, we show it is possible that, by making the covariate imbalance diminishing at a proper rate as the sample size increases, rerandomization can achieve its ideally optimal precision that one can expect with perfectly balanced covariates, while still maintaining its robustness. We further investigate conditions on the number of covariates for achieving the desired optimality. Our results rely on a more delicate asymptotic analysis for rerandomization. The derived theory for rerandomization provides a deeper understanding of its large-sample property and can better guide its practical implementation. Furthermore, it also helps reconcile the controversy between randomized and optimal designs in an asymptotic sense.

Design-based theory for Lasso adjustment in randomized block experiments and rerandomized experiments

Design-Based Theory for Lasso Adjustment in Randomized Block Experiments and Rerandomized Experiments

Blocking, rerandomization, and regression adjustment in randomized experiments with high-dimensional covariates

Lasso-adjusted treatment effect estimation under covariate-adaptive randomization

Lasso Adjustments Of Treatment Effect Estimates In Randomized Experiments

A general theory of regression adjustment for covariate-adaptive randomization: OLS, Lasso, and beyond

Design-based theory for cluster rerandomization

A Lasso-OLS Hybrid Approach to Covariate Selection and Average Treatment Effect Estimation for Clustered RCTs Using Design-Based Methods

Randomization-based Joint Central Limit Theorem and Efficient Covariate Adjustment in Randomized Block 2K Factorial Experiments

Efficient Randomized-Adaptive Designs

Regression-adjusted Average Treatment Effect Estimates in Stratified Randomized Experiments

Robust Blocked Response-Adaptive Randomization Designs

Rerandomization and covariate adjustment in split-plot designs

On Optimal Rerandomization Designs

Rerandomization in Stratified Randomized Experiments

Randomization-based joint central limit theorem and efficient covariate adjustment in stratified $2^K$ factorial experiments

The covariate-adjusted residual estimator and its use in both randomized trials and observational settings

A practical Response Adaptive Block Randomization (RABR) design with analytic type I error protection

Design-Based Estimation and Central Limit Theorems for Local Average Treatment Effects for RCTs

Rerandomization with Diminishing Covariate Imbalance and Diverging Number of Covariates

Regression Analysis for Covariate-Adaptive Randomization: A Robust and Efficient Inference Perspective