Abstract:Linearisation is often used as a first step in the analysis of nonlinear initial boundary value problems. The linearisation procedure frequently results in a confusing contradiction where the nonlinear problem conserves energy and has an energy bound but the linearised version does not (or vice versa). In this paper we attempt to resolve that contradiction and relate nonlinear energy conserving and bounded initial boundary value problems to their linearised versions and the related dual problems. We start by showing that a specific skew-symmetric form of the primal nonlinear problem leads to energy conservation and a bound. Next, we show that this specific form together with a non-standard linearisation procedure preserves these properties for the new slightly modified linearised problem. We proceed to show that the corresponding linear and nonlinear dual (or self-adjoint) problems also have bounds and conserve energy due to this specific formulation. Next, the implication of the new formulation on the choice of boundary conditions is discussed. A straightforward nonlinear and linear analysis may lead to a different number and type of boundary conditions required for an energy bound. We show that the new formulation shed some light on this contradiction. We conclude by illustrating that the new continuous formulation automatically lead to energy stable and energy conserving numerical approximations for both linear and nonlinear primal and dual problems if the approximations are formulated on summation-by-parts form.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the relationship between nonlinear and linearized initial - boundary value problems (IBVP), especially their energy conservation and boundedness. Specifically, the author tries to explain why in some cases, although the nonlinear problem has energy conservation and boundedness, its linearized version may not have these properties (or vice versa). This contradiction is not only theoretically puzzling but also leads to the ill - posedness of the dual problem in practical applications, which in turn causes numerical stability problems. ### Main problem summary: 1. **Contradiction between energy conservation and boundedness**: The contradiction between the energy conservation and boundedness of the nonlinear problem and its linearized version. 2. **Ill - posedness of the dual problem**: Due to the above contradiction, the dual problem of the linearized problem may become ill - posed, thus affecting numerical stability. 3. **Selection of boundary conditions**: Nonlinear and linear analysis may lead to different numbers and types of required boundary conditions. How to handle this difference uniformly? ### Solutions: To overcome these problems, the author introduces a new linearization method and uses a specific skew - symmetric form to ensure that both the nonlinear and linearized problems can maintain energy conservation and boundedness. The keys of this method are: - **Skew - symmetric form**: By appropriately transforming the original nonlinear problem to make it have a skew - symmetric form, thereby ensuring energy conservation and boundedness. - **Improved linearization process**: Retain some terms that are usually ignored in the standard linearization process to ensure that the linearized problem also has the same energy characteristics. ### Specific steps: 1. **Introduce skew - symmetric form**: Rewrite the nonlinear problem into a skew - symmetric form to ensure energy conservation and boundedness. 2. **Improve the linearization method**: Retain more terms during the linearization process to avoid the energy growth problem in the traditional linearization method. 3. **Analyze the dual problem**: Prove that the dual problems of the linearized and nonlinear problems also have energy conservation and boundedness. 4. **Discuss boundary conditions**: Explore the differences in the selection of boundary conditions between nonlinear and linearized problems and propose a unified treatment method. Through these methods, the author successfully solves the contradiction in energy characteristics between nonlinear and linearized problems and provides a theoretical basis for numerical stability and energy conservation. ### Example: The paper shows how to apply these methods through multiple examples (such as the Burgers equation, the two - dimensional incompressible Euler equation, the three - dimensional incompressible Euler equation in cylindrical coordinate system, the two - dimensional shallow water wave equation, etc.), ensuring that both the nonlinear and linearized problems can maintain energy conservation and boundedness. ### Conclusion: This paper provides a new method to handle the relationship between nonlinear and linearized initial - boundary value problems, especially in terms of energy conservation and boundedness. This not only solves the theoretical contradiction but also provides important guidance for numerical stability in practical applications.

Nonlinear and Linearised Primal and Dual Initial Boundary Value Problems: When are they Bounded? How are they Connected?

Nonlinear Boundary Conditions for Energy and Entropy Stable Initial Boundary Value Problems in Computational Fluid Dynamics

Nonlinear Boundary Conditions for Initial Boundary Value Problems with Applications in Computational Fluid Dynamics

Initial-boundary value problems for discrete evolution equations: discrete linear Schrodinger and integrable discrete nonlinear Schrodinger equations

Well-posed two-point initial-boundary value problems with arbitrary boundary conditions

Convergence to equilibrium for some nonlinear evolution equations with dynamical boundary condition

An effective approach for solving a class of nonlinear singular boundary value problems arising in different physical phenomena

Solving nonlinear boundary value problems by a boundary shape function method and a splitting and linearizing method

Non-coercive Neumann Boundary Control Problems

Increasing Stability in the Linearized Inverse Schrödinger Potential Problem with Power Type Nonlinearities

Bound states of nonlinear Schrödinger equations with potentials tending to zero at infinity

Initial-boundary value problems for the defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation in the semiclassical limit

Bilateral Bounds for Norms of Solutions and Boundedness/Stability and Instability of Some Nonlinear Systems with Delays and Variable Coefficients

Nonlinearizing Two-parameter Eigenvalue Problems

The Formulation and Analysis of Energy-Preserving Schemes for Solving High-Dimensional Nonlinear Klein–Gordon Equations

The Generalized Nonlinear Initial–boundary Riemann Problem for Quasilinear Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws

Initial-boundary value problem for second order hyperbolic operator with mixed boundary conditions

Projections, Embeddings and Stability

Boundary Conditions for Kinetic Theory‐based Models II: A Linearized Moment System

Nonlinear second-order multivalued boundary value problems

Energy-critical inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation with two power-type nonlinearities