Conducting more inclusive solar geoengineering research: A feminist science framework

Ben Kravitz,Tina Sikka

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.04217

2021-08-28

Abstract:Solar geoengineering, or deliberate climate modification, has been receiving increased attention in recent years. Given the far-reaching consequences of any potential solar geoengineering deployments, it is prudent to identify inherent biases, blind spots, and other potential issues at all stages of the research process. Here we articulate a feminist science-based framework to concretely describe how solar geoengineering researchers can be more inclusive of different perspectives, in the process illuminating potential implicit bias and enhancing the conclusions that can be gained from their studies. Importantly, this framework is an adoptable method of practice that can be refined, with the aim of conducting better research in solar geoengineering. As an illustration, we retrospectively apply this framework to a well-read solar geoengineering study, improving transparency by revealing its implicit values, conclusions made from its evidence base, and the methodologies that study pursues. We conclude with a set of recommendations for the geoengineering research community whereby more inclusive research can become a regular part of practice. Throughout this process, we illustrate how feminist science scholars can use this approach to study climate modeling.

Physics and Society,History and Philosophy of Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main issues that this paper attempts to address in solar geoengineering research are the single perspective, potential biases, and methodological limitations. Specifically:

1. **Single Perspective**: Currently, most solar geoengineering research is primarily led by scientists from wealthy industrialized countries, leading to a narrow research perspective that overlooks the viewpoints and needs of other regions, especially developing countries.

2. **Potential Biases**: Existing research may contain implicit gender, racial, and other forms of biases, which can affect the objectivity and applicability of the research results.

3. **Methodological Limitations**: Current research methods are often overly idealized, lacking consideration of social feedback and multidisciplinary interactions, which may result in partial and inaccurate research conclusions.

To address these issues, the paper proposes a framework based on Feminist Contextual Empiricism (FCE), aiming to introduce more diverse perspectives, reveal implicit assumptions and values in research, and improve the quality and policy relevance of research through more inclusive methods. By retrospectively analyzing an existing case of solar geoengineering research, the paper demonstrates how to apply this framework to improve research methods and conclusions.