Rapidly and accurately estimating brain strain and strain rate across head impact types with transfer learning and data fusion

Xianghao Zhan,Yuzhe Liu,Nicholas J. Cecchi,Olivier Gevaert,Michael M. Zeineh,Gerald A. Grant,David B. Camarillo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2024.3354192
2021-08-31
Abstract:Brain strain and strain rate are effective in predicting traumatic brain injury (TBI) caused by head impacts. However, state-of-the-art finite element modeling (FEM) demands considerable computational time in the computation, limiting its application in real-time TBI risk monitoring. To accelerate, machine learning head models (MLHMs) were developed, and the model accuracy was found to decrease when the training/test datasets were from different head impacts types. However, the size of dataset for specific impact types may not be enough for model training. To address the computational cost of FEM, the limited strain rate prediction, and the generalizability of MLHMs to on-field datasets, we propose data fusion and transfer learning to develop a series of MLHMs to predict the maximum principal strain (MPS) and maximum principal strain rate (MPSR). We trained and tested the MLHMs on 13,623 head impacts from simulations, American football, mixed martial arts, car crash, and compared against the models trained on only simulations or only on-field impacts. The MLHMs developed with transfer learning are significantly more accurate in estimating MPS and MPSR than other models, with a mean absolute error (MAE) smaller than 0.03 in predicting MPS and smaller than 7 (1/s) in predicting MPSR on all impact datasets. The MLHMs can be applied to various head impact types for rapidly and accurately calculating brain strain and strain rate. Besides the clinical applications in real-time brain strain and strain rate monitoring, this model helps researchers estimate the brain strain and strain rate caused by head impacts more efficiently than FEM.
Machine Learning,Medical Physics,Quantitative Methods,Tissues and Organs
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on the following aspects: 1. **High computational cost of finite element modeling (FEM)**: The existing FEM methods require a large amount of computational time when calculating brain strain and strain rate, which limits its application in real - time traumatic brain injury (TBI) risk monitoring. 2. **Insufficient generalization ability of machine - learning head models (MLHM)**: The existing MLHM has low prediction accuracy on different types of head - impact datasets, especially performing poorly on small - scale actual on - site impact datasets. This is because there are differences in the data distributions of different types of head - impact data, and the existing MLHM is difficult to adapt to these differences. 3. **Lack of the ability to predict brain strain and strain rate simultaneously**: The existing MLHM mainly focuses on the prediction of brain strain while ignoring the prediction of strain rate. However, the strain rate is also important for predicting traumatic axonal injury (TAI), so it is necessary to develop a model that can predict both simultaneously. To address the above problems, the paper proposes two strategies to optimize MLHM: - **Data Fusion**: Combine simulation data and actual on - site impact data to improve the generalization ability and prediction accuracy of the model. - **Transfer Learning**: Fine - tune the pre - trained MLHM on the actual on - site impact data to make it better adapt to specific types of actual on - site impact data. Through these strategies, the paper aims to develop a series of MLHM that can quickly and accurately predict the maximum principal strain (MPS) and the maximum principal strain rate (MPSR) under different types of head impacts, thereby providing more effective tools for clinical applications and research.