Abstract:This study constructs a growth model of the Great Divergence that formalizes Pomeranz's (2000) hypothesis that the relief of land constraints in Europe has caused divergence in economic growth between Europe and China since the 19th century. The model consists of the agricultural and manufacturing sectors. The agricultural sector produces subsistence goods from land, intermediate goods from the manufacturing sector, and labor. The manufacturing sector produces goods from labor, and its productivity grows through the learning-by-doing of full-time manufacturing workers. Households make fertility decisions. In the model, a large exogenous positive shock in land supply causes the transition of the economy from the Malthusian state, in which all workers are engaged in agricultural production and per capita income is constant, to the non-Malthusian state, in which the share of workers engaged in agricultural production gradually decreases and per capita income grows at a roughly constant growth rate. The quantitative predictions of the model provide several insights into the causes of the Great Divergence.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the question of why there has been a significant divergence in economic growth between Europe and China since the 19th century, known as the "Great Divergence." Specifically, the author constructs an economic growth model to formalize Pomeranz's (2000) hypothesis that the alleviation of land constraints in Europe led to the difference in economic growth rates between Europe and China.
### Main Research Questions:
1. **Reasons for the divergence in economic growth between Europe and China**: The paper explores the reasons for the significant differences in economic growth between Europe and China after the 19th century, particularly why the Industrial Revolution occurred in Britain rather than in China.
2. **Alleviation of land constraints**: The author focuses on how the increase in land supply affected economic structure and growth patterns, especially the changes in the agricultural and manufacturing sectors.
3. **Population dynamics and economic transformation**: The paper also analyzes the role of population dynamics in this transformation process, including the impact of family fertility decisions on labor allocation.
### Research Background:
- **Pomeranz's Hypothesis**: Pomeranz (2000) argued that in the 18th century, China's technology, institutions, and market efficiency were not inferior to those of Europe, and in some regions, the GDP levels were comparable. However, after the mid-18th century, Britain's GDP began to grow significantly, while China's did not. Pomeranz believed that the key factors were the use of coal and imports from the New World, which alleviated land constraints and promoted the Industrial Revolution in Britain.
- **Economic Stagnation and Growth**: The paper hypothesizes that before the Industrial Revolution, per capita income remained largely unchanged, while after the Industrial Revolution, per capita income began to grow continuously.
### Research Methods:
- **Two-sector growth model**: The paper constructs an economic growth model that includes two sectors: agriculture and manufacturing. The agricultural sector produces necessities, while the manufacturing sector improves productivity through labor accumulation of experience.
- **Land supply shock**: The model assumes an exogenous increase in land supply, which leads the economy to transition from a Malthusian state (where all labor is engaged in agricultural production and per capita income remains unchanged) to a non-Malthusian state (where the proportion of agricultural labor decreases and per capita income grows continuously).
- **Population dynamics**: The model considers family fertility decisions and the impact of population growth on resource demand.
### Main Findings:
- **Impact of increased land supply**: Through quantitative analysis, the paper finds that the increase in land supply can explain the transition of the British economy from stagnation to continuous growth.
- **Role of population dynamics**: The model shows that population dynamics played an important role in this process, especially after alleviating land constraints, as labor shifted from agriculture to manufacturing, driving economic growth.
### Conclusion:
By constructing a formal economic growth model, the paper explains Pomeranz's hypothesis about the divergence in economic growth between Europe and China and provides quantitative support. The study indicates that the increase in land supply was one of the key factors leading to the Industrial Revolution and economic growth in Britain.