The mystery of energy compensation

Lewis G. Halsey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.13418

2021-07-26

Abstract:The received wisdom on how activity affects energy expenditure is that the more activity is undertaken, the more calories will have been burned by the end of the day. Yet traditional hunter-gatherers, who lead physically hard lives, burn no more calories each day than western populations living in labour-saving environments. Indeed, there is now a wealth of data, both for humans and other animals, demonstrating that long-term lifestyle changes involving increases in exercise or other physical activities do not result in commensurate increases in daily energy expenditure (DEE). This is because humans and other animals exhibit a degree of energy compensation at the organismal level, ameliorating some of the increases in DEE that would occur from the increased activity by decreasing the energy expended on other biological processes. And energy compensation can be sizable, reaching many hundreds of calories in humans. But the processes that are downregulated in the long-term to achieve energy compensation are far from clear, particularly in humans. We do not know how energy compensation is achieved. My review here of the literature on relevant exercise intervention studies, for both humans and other species, indicates conflict regarding the role that basal metabolic rate (BMR) or low level activity such as fidgeting play, if any, particularly once changes in body composition are factored out. In situations where BMR and low-level activity are not major components of energy compensation, what then drives it? I discuss how changes in mitochondrial efficiency and changes in circadian fluctuations in BMR may contribute to our understanding of energy management. Currently unexplored, these mechanisms and others may provide important insights into the mystery of how energy compensation is achieved.

Other Quantitative Biology,Biological Physics,Populations and Evolution

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Solve

This paper attempts to address the issue of **energy compensation**. Specifically, the authors explore why, in the context of long-term lifestyle changes, daily energy expenditure (DEE) in humans and animals does not increase correspondingly even with increased exercise or other physical activities.

#### Background
The traditional view holds that the more active one is, the more calories are burned in a day. However, research shows that traditional hunter-gatherers, despite leading highly physically demanding lives, have daily energy expenditures similar to those of Western populations living in labor-saving environments. This phenomenon suggests that humans and animals achieve a certain degree of "energy compensation" by reducing energy expenditure in other biological processes when activity levels increase.

#### Main Issues
1. **Existence of Energy Compensation**: Why does increased activity not lead to a linear increase in daily energy expenditure?
2. **Mechanisms of Energy Compensation**: Which physiological processes are downregulated to achieve energy compensation when activity levels are increased over the long term?
3. **Specific Processes of Energy Compensation**: What roles do basal metabolic rate (BMR) and low-level activities (such as "fidgeting" or "restlessness") play in energy compensation?

#### Current Research Status
- **Human Studies**: Many studies and reviews hypothesize that energy compensation is primarily achieved by reducing non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT), but the evidence is inconsistent.
- **Animal Studies**: Animal experiments, especially those involving mice, provide more evidence of NEAT reduction, but these reductions are usually small and may not fully explain the total energy compensation.
- **Changes in BMR**: Some studies suggest that BMR may decrease after long-term increases in activity levels, but this decrease is often accompanied by weight loss, making it difficult to determine if the decrease in BMR is directly caused by increased activity.

#### Future Research Directions
- **Direct Measurement of NEAT**: More precise methods are needed to directly measure NEAT to clarify its role in energy compensation.
- **Long-term Changes in BMR**: More long-term studies are needed to observe changes in BMR following increased activity levels, especially in cases where significant weight changes do not occur.
- **Other Potential Mechanisms**: Exploring other possible mechanisms, such as changes in mitochondrial efficiency and circadian rhythm fluctuations, to better understand energy management.

In summary, this paper aims to delve into the mechanisms of energy compensation, particularly the roles of basal metabolic rate and low-level activities, and to highlight the contradictions in current research and future research directions.