The False COVID-19 Narratives That Keep Being Debunked: A Spatiotemporal Analysis

Iknoor Singh,Kalina Bontcheva,Carolina Scarton

2024-04-24

Abstract:The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic led to a global infodemic that has brought unprecedented challenges for citizens, media, and fact-checkers worldwide. To address this challenge, over a hundred fact-checking initiatives worldwide have been monitoring the information space in their countries and publishing regular debunks of viral false COVID-19 narratives. This study examines the database of the CoronaVirusFacts Alliance, which contains 10,381 debunks related to COVID-19 published in multiple languages by different fact-checking organisations. Our spatiotemporal analysis reveals that similar or nearly duplicate false COVID-19 narratives have been spreading in multiple modalities and on various social media platforms in different countries, sometimes as much as several months after the first debunk of that narrative has been published by an International Fact-checking Network (IFCN) fact-checker. We also find that misinformation involving general medical advice has spread across multiple countries and hence has the highest proportion of false COVID-19 narratives that keep being debunked. Furthermore, as manual fact-checking is an onerous task in itself, therefore the need to repeatedly debunk the same narrative in different countries is leading, over time, to a significant waste of fact-checker resources. To this end, we propose the idea of including a multilingual debunk search tool in the fact-checking pipeline, in addition to recommending strongly that social media platforms need to adopt the same technology at scale, so as to make the best use of scarce fact-checker resources.

Computers and Society,Social and Information Networks

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Aims to Address

This paper aims to address the global spread of misinformation and disinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically:

1. **Recurring False Narratives**:
- The study found that similar or nearly identical false narratives were repeatedly spread across different countries and social media platforms, sometimes even months after being debunked by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) fact-checkers.

2. **Cross-Language and Cross-Regional Spread**:
- Fact-checking organizations in different countries have debunked the same or similar false narratives multiple times, especially regarding general medical advice. These false narratives spread across multiple countries, making them the most frequently debunked type.

3. **Resource Wastage**:
- Manual fact-checking is a daunting task, and the repeated debunking of the same narratives in different countries leads to a significant waste of fact-checkers' resources.

4. **Need for Multilingual Retrieval Tools**:
- To better utilize limited fact-checking resources, the paper proposes the need to incorporate multilingual debunking search tools into the fact-checking process and suggests that social media platforms should also adopt this technology to more effectively identify and handle already debunked misinformation.

By analyzing 10,381 debunking records from the IFCN's CoronaVirusFacts Alliance database, the study reveals the temporal and spatial characteristics of these false narratives' spread and highlights the issue of repeatedly fact-checking the same narratives in a multilingual environment.