Abstract:Experimental measurements and numerical simulations of turbulent flows are characterized by a tradeoff between accuracy and resolution. In this study, we combine accurate sparse pointwise mean velocity measurements with the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations using data assimilation methods. Importantly, we bridge the gap between data assimilation (DA) using physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and variational methods based on classical spatial discretization of the flow equations, by comparing both approaches on the same turbulent flow case. First, by constraining the PINN with sparse data and the underdetermined RANS equations without closure, we show that the mean flow is reconstructed to a higher accuracy than a RANS solver using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model. Second, we propose the SA turbulence model augmented PINN (PINN-DA-SA), which outperforms the former approach by up to 73% reduction in mean velocity reconstruction error with coarse measurements. The additional SA physics constraints improve flow reconstructions in regions with high velocity and pressure gradients and separation. Third, we compare the PINN-DA-SA approach to a variational data assimilation using the same sparse velocity measurements and physics constraints. The PINN-DA-SA achieves lower reconstruction error across a range of data resolutions. This is attributed to discretization errors in the variational methodology that are avoided by PINNs. We demonstrate the method using high-fidelity measurements from direct numerical simulation of the turbulent periodic hill at Re=5600 . https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.034605 Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Published by the American Physical Society

Robust deep learning for emulating turbulent viscosities

An efficient training method to learn a model of turbulence

A Deep Learning Approach For Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification Of Turbulent Flow Simulations

Convolutional Neural Networks For Turbulent Model Uncertainty Quantification

Forecasting small scale dynamics of fluid turbulence using deep neural networks

An interpretable framework of data-driven turbulence modeling using deep neural networks

A turbulent eddy-viscosity surrogate modeling framework for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations

Fluid Viscosity Prediction Leveraging Computer Vision and Robot Interaction

A deep learning framework for turbulence modeling using data assimilation and feature extraction

End-to-end differentiable learning of turbulence models from indirect observations

Comparison of Generative Learning Methods for Turbulence Modeling

Convolutional autoencoder for the spatiotemporal latent representation of turbulence

Validation and parameterization of a novel physics-constrained neural dynamics model applied to turbulent fluid flow

Turbulence model augmented physics-informed neural networks for mean-flow reconstruction

Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance

Embedded training of neural-network sub-grid-scale turbulence models

Non-intrusive, transferable model for coupled turbulent channel-porous media flow based upon neural networks

Physics-Informed Tensor Basis Neural Network for Turbulence Closure Modeling

Turbulence model augmented physics informed neural networks for mean flow reconstruction

Discovering Artificial Viscosity Models for Discontinuous Galerkin Approximation of Conservation Laws using Physics-Informed Machine Learning

Inferring parameters and reconstruction of two-dimensional turbulent flows with physics-informed neural networks