Abstract:Artificial Intelligence (AI) has achieved remarkable success in image generation, image analysis, and language modeling, making data-driven techniques increasingly relevant in practical real-world applications, promising enhanced creativity and efficiency for human users. However, the deployment of AI in high-stakes domains such as infrastructure and healthcare still raises concerns regarding algorithm accountability and safety. The emerging field of explainable AI (XAI) has made significant strides in developing interfaces that enable humans to comprehend the decisions made by data-driven models. Among these approaches, concept-based explainability stands out due to its ability to align explanations with high-level concepts familiar to users. Nonetheless, early research in adversarial machine learning has unveiled that exposing model explanations can render victim models more susceptible to attacks. This is the first study to investigate and compare the impact of concept-based explanations on the privacy of Deep Learning based AI models in the context of biomedical image analysis. An extensive privacy benchmark is conducted on three different state-of-the-art model architectures (ResNet50, NFNet, ConvNeXt) trained on two biomedical (ISIC and EyePACS) and one synthetic dataset (SCDB). The success of membership inference attacks while exposing varying degrees of attribution-based and concept-based explanations is systematically compared. The findings indicate that, in theory, concept-based explanations can potentially increase the vulnerability of a private AI system by up to 16% compared to attributions in the baseline setting. However, it is demonstrated that, in more realistic attack scenarios, the threat posed by explanations is negligible in practice. Furthermore, actionable recommendations are provided to ensure the safe deployment of concept-based XAI systems. In addition, the impact of differential privacy (DP) on the quality of concept-based explanations is explored, revealing that while negatively influencing the explanation ability, DP can have an adverse effect on the models' privacy.

Towards Privacy-preserving Explanations in Medical Image Analysis

Privacy-Preserving Case-Based Explanations: Enabling Visual Interpretability by Protecting Privacy

Anonymizing medical case-based explanations through disentanglement

The privacy-explainability trade-off: unraveling the impacts of differential privacy and federated learning on attribution methods

Privacy Meets Explainability: A Comprehensive Impact Benchmark

Translating theory into practice: assessing the privacy implications of concept-based explanations for biomedical AI

Privacy-Preserving in Medical Image Analysis: A Review of Methods and Applications

Improving Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks in Medical Diagnosis by Investigating the Individual Units

Explainability of deep learning models in medical video analysis: a survey

Towards Case-based Interpretability for Medical Federated Learning

Privacy-Preserving Medical Image Classification through Deep Learning and Matrix Decomposition

Transparency of deep neural networks for medical image analysis: A review of interpretability methods

Visual explanations for polyp detection: How medical doctors assess intrinsic versus extrinsic explanations

Plaintext-Free Deep Learning for Privacy-Preserving Medical Image Analysis via Frequency Information Embedding

What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?

Explainable Deep Learning Methods in Medical Image Classification: A Survey

Explainable Deep Learning Methods in Medical Imaging Diagnosis: A Survey

Visual Interpretable and Explainable Deep Learning Models for Brain Tumor MRI and COVID-19 Chest X-ray Images

Privacy-preserving machine learning for healthcare: open challenges and future perspectives

Enhancing Deep Learning Model Explainability in Brain Tumor Datasets using Post-Heuristic Approaches

Generating Post-Hoc Explanation from Deep Neural Networks for Multi-Modal Medical Image Analysis Tasks