Abstract:Despite some discomfort with this grandly philosophical topic, I do in fact hope to address a venerable pair of philosophical chestnuts: mathematical truth and existence. My plan is to set out three possible stands on these issues, for an exercise in compare and contrast. A word of warning, though, to philosophical purists (and perhaps of comfort to more mathematical readers): I will explore these philosophical positions with an eye to their interconnections with some concrete issues of set theoretic method. Let me begin with a brief look at what to count as ‘philosophy’. To some extent, this is a matter of usage, and mathematicians sometimes classify as ‘philosophical’ any considerations other than outright proofs. So, for example, discussions of the propriety of particular mathematical methods would fall under this heading: should we prefer analytic or synthetic approaches in geometry? Should elliptic functions be treated in terms of explicit representations (as in Weierstrass) or geometrically (as in Riemann)? Should we allow impredicative definitions? Should we restrict ourselves to a logic without bivalence or the law of the excluded middle? Also included in this category would be the trains of thought that shaped our central concepts: should a function always be defined by a formula? Should a group be required to have an inverse for every element? Should ideal divisors be defined contextually or explicitly, treated computationally or abstractly? In addition, there are more general questions concerning mathematical values, aims and goals: Should we strive for powerful theories or low-risk theories? How much stress should be placed on the fact or promise of physical applications? How important are interconnections between the various branches of mathematics? These philosophical questions of method naturally include several peculiar to set theory: should set theorists focus their efforts on drawing consequences for areas of interest to mathematicians outside mathematical logic? Should exploration of the standard axioms of ZFC be preferred to the exploration and exploitation of new axioms? How should axioms for set theory be chosen? What would a solution to the Continuum Problem look like?

The Empirical Metamathematics of Euclid and Beyond

Euclid After Computer Proof-checking

Refuting the Metaphysics of Wolfram and Tegmark

Euclidean rigor and the curious case of the (missing) reflex angle

Epistemological Notes on Mathematics

Experiences of infinity and of generality in Book I of Euclid's Elements

Mathematical Existence

Decoding Book II of the Elements

Mathematics. Systematical Concepts

Why Did Weyl Think that Emmy Noether Made Algebra the Eldorado of Axiomatics?

Experimentation in the Schubert Calculus

Der Code der Mathematik

Ruliology: Linking Computation, Observers and Physical Law

Experimental Mathematics and Mathematical Physics

Mathematical conquerors, Unguru polarity, and the task of history

The logic of empirical theories revisited

The Many Faces of the Subspace Theorem (after Adamczewski, Bugeaud, Corvaja, Zannier...)

Total Empiricism: Learning from Data

Independence Phenomena in Mathematics: a Set Theoretic Perspective on Current Obstacles and Scenarios for Solutions

Plato and the foundations of mathematics

Learning Formal Mathematics From Intrinsic Motivation