Abstract:We propose a model, which nests a susceptible-infected-recovered-deceased (SIRD) epidemic model into a dynamic macroeconomic equilibrium framework with agents' mobility. The latter affect both their income and their probability of infecting and being infected. Strategic complementarities among individual mobility choices drive the evolution of aggregate economic activity, while infection externalities caused by individual mobility affect disease diffusion. The continuum of rational forward-looking agents coordinates on the Nash equilibrium of a discrete time, finite-state, infinite-horizon Mean Field Game. We prove the existence of an equilibrium and provide a recursive construction method for the search of an equilibrium(a), which also guides our numerical investigations. We calibrate the model by using Italian experience on COVID-19 epidemic and we discuss policy implications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how individuals' mobility decisions affect economic activities and the spread of diseases during an epidemic. Specifically, the author proposes a model (ESIRD model) that integrates the Susceptible - Infected - Recovered - Deceased (SIRD) epidemic model and a dynamic macro - economic equilibrium framework, in which agents' mobility choices not only affect their income but also the probability of being infected or infecting others. This model aims to explore how strategic complementarities in individual mobility decisions drive the evolution of overall economic activities, and how the infection externalities caused by individual mobility affect disease diffusion. By constructing a Nash - equilibrium discrete - time, finite - state, infinite - horizon Mean Field Game (MFG), the paper proves the existence of equilibrium and provides a recursive construction method to find the equilibrium, thus guiding numerical research. In addition, the paper also calibrates the model using empirical data from Italy during the COVID - 19 epidemic and discusses the policy implications.
### Key Points of the Model
1. **Model Structure**:
- **SIRD Model**: Describes the dynamics of disease transmission, including four states: Susceptible, Infected, Recovered, and Deceased.
- **Macroeconomic Model**: Describes the dynamics of economic activities, considering the impact of individuals' mobility choices on their income.
2. **Individual Decisions**:
- Individuals maximize an inter - temporal utility function, considering consumption and mobility costs.
- An individual's work mobility and consumption mobility depend on their health status, the overall level of economic activity, current and future mobility restriction policies, and future utility, which in turn depends on the probability of being infected in the future and future economic dynamics.
3. **Strategic Complementarity and Negative Externalities**:
- **Strategic Complementarity**: An individual's mobility decision has strategic complementarity with other agents' mobility choices because the marginal benefit of individual mobility increases as the mobility of other agents increases.
- **Negative Externalities**: Individuals internalize the risk of being infected in their mobility choices but do not internalize the risk of infecting others, which leads to negative externalities.
4. **Equilibrium and Algorithm**:
- The paper proves the existence of equilibrium in the mean - field game and provides a recursive algorithm to identify and numerically simulate this equilibrium.
### Main Contributions
1. **Epidemic - Macroeconomic Literature**: Proposes an integrated evaluation model that combines economic dynamics with an epidemic model, with particular attention to the modeling of individual behavior.
2. **Methodology**: Belongs to the class of discounted infinite - horizon, discrete - time, finite - state - space Mean Field Games (MFG), and proposes new existence theorems and recursive construction methods for equilibrium.
3. **Endogenous Determination of Infection Rate**: Considers the endogenous influence of individual mobility choices on the infection rate and the basic reproduction number (Reproduction Rate).
4. **Policy Evaluation**: Provides a theoretical framework for evaluating restrictive policies, going beyond the simple trade - off between economic losses and mortality rates, considering social feasibility and the sustainability of the health system.
### Examples of Formulas
- **Immediate Utility Function**:
\[
u(t, c(t), k(t), \vartheta(t)) := \ln c(t) - \gamma_p(t, k(t), \mu(t)) \vartheta_p(t) - \gamma_c(t, k(t), \mu(t)) \vartheta_c(t) - M
\]
where \( c(t) \) is individual consumption, \( \gamma_p \) and \( \gamma_c \) are the marginal utility costs of entering the labor market and the consumption market respectively, and \( M \) is an exogenous constant utility in the death state.
- **Relationship between Consumption and Income**:
\[
c(t) = (P_0 + P_1 \vartheta_c(t)) y(t)
\]
where \( y(t) \) is individual income, and \( P_0 \) and \( P_1 \) are exogenous constants.
- **Individual Income**