Abstract:The performance of state-of-the-art offline RL methods varies widely over the spectrum of dataset qualities, ranging from far-from-optimal random data to close-to-optimal expert demonstrations. We re-implement these methods to test their reproducibility, and show that when a given method outperforms the others on one end of the spectrum, it never does on the other end. This prevents us from naming a victor across the board. We attribute the asymmetry to the amount of inductive bias injected into the agent to entice it to posit that the behavior underlying the offline dataset is optimal for the task. Our investigations confirm that careless injections of such optimality inductive biases make dominant agents subpar as soon as the offline policy is sub-optimal. To bridge this gap, we generalize importance-weighted regression methods that have proved the most versatile across the spectrum of dataset grades into a modular framework that allows for the design of methods that align with how much we know about the dataset. This modularity enables qualitatively different injections of optimality inductive biases. We show that certain orchestrations strike the right balance, improving the return on one end of the spectrum without harming it on the other end. While the formulation of guidelines for the design of an offline method reduces to aligning the amount of optimality bias to inject with what we know about the quality of the data, the design of an agnostic method for which we need not know the quality of the data beforehand is more nuanced. Only our framework allowed us to design a method that performed well across the spectrum while remaining modular if more information about the quality of the data ever becomes available.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to solve a key problem in offline reinforcement learning (Offline Reinforcement Learning, Offline RL), that is, how to design an offline RL method that can perform well on datasets of different qualities. Specifically: 1. **Limitations of Existing Methods**: - The performance of existing offline RL methods varies greatly on datasets of different qualities. When the dataset quality is close to optimal, some methods perform well; but when the dataset quality is poor, the performance of these methods drops significantly. - This asymmetry is attributed to the "optimality inductive biases" injected into the agent. Excessive or improper biases will cause the agent to perform poorly when facing sub - optimal datasets. 2. **Objectives**: - The author aims to evaluate the reproducibility of existing offline RL methods by re - implementing them and reveal the performance differences of different methods under different dataset qualities. - Propose a new framework that can flexibly adjust the amount of optimality inductive bias injection based on the understanding of dataset quality, so as to design an offline RL method that can perform well on datasets of different qualities. 3. **Specific Problems**: - How to design an offline RL method that can handle both high - quality and low - quality datasets without knowing the dataset quality in advance? - How to introduce appropriate inductive biases so that the agent can still maintain good performance when facing sub - optimal datasets? ### Main Contributions of the Paper 1. **Critical Evaluation of Existing Methods**: - The author open - sourced a fair re - implementation of existing offline RL methods and conducted experimental evaluations in a unified framework, showing the performance differences of different methods under different dataset qualities. 2. **Formal Definition and Experimental Verification of Optimality Inductive Bias**: - Clearly defined the concept of "optimality inductive bias" and experimentally verified the impact of the amount of bias on the agent's performance. The results show that most baseline methods inject too much optimality inductive bias, resulting in poor performance on sub - optimal datasets. 3. **Proposing the Generalized Importance - Weighted Regression (GIWR) Framework**: - Proposed a new, highly modular framework - Generalized Importance - Weighted Regression (GIWR), which allows flexible adjustment of the way of optimality inductive bias injection. - Experiments show that the GIWR framework can improve performance when the dataset quality is close to optimal and will not damage performance when the dataset quality is poor. ### Summary The core problem of this paper is to design an offline RL method that can perform well on datasets of different qualities, and solve the performance asymmetry problem of existing methods under different dataset qualities by introducing appropriate optimality inductive biases.

Optimality Inductive Biases and Agnostic Guidelines for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Beyond Reward: Offline Preference-guided Policy Optimization

DROP: Conservative Model-based Optimization for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Design from Policies: Conservative Test-Time Adaptation for Offline Policy Optimization

Survival Instinct in Offline Reinforcement Learning

Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of Pessimism

Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Data

Bayesian Design Principles for Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning

Offline RL Policies Should be Trained to be Adaptive

Offline RL With Realistic Datasets: Heteroskedasticity and Support Constraints

Offline Data Enhanced On-Policy Policy Gradient with Provable Guarantees

When Demonstrations Meet Generative World Models: A Maximum Likelihood Framework for Offline Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Align Your Intents: Offline Imitation Learning via Optimal Transport

Towards Instance-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning with Pessimism

Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL?

Reward-agnostic Fine-tuning: Provable Statistical Benefits of Hybrid Reinforcement Learning

Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning: The Critic is Critical

Offline Retraining for Online RL: Decoupled Policy Learning to Mitigate Exploration Bias

Domain Adaptation for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Limited Samples

Improving and Benchmarking Offline Reinforcement Learning Algorithms

Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning With Relaxed Conservatism