Abstract:Inverse problems constrained by partial differential equations (PDEs) play a critical role in model development and calibration. In many applications, there are multiple uncertain parameters in a model that must be estimated. However, high dimensionality of the parameters and computational complexity of the PDE solves make such problems challenging. A common approach is to reduce the dimension by fixing some parameters (which we will call auxiliary parameters) to a best estimate and use techniques from PDE-constrained optimization to estimate the other parameters. In this article, hyper-differential sensitivity analysis (HDSA) is used to assess the sensitivity of the solution of the PDE-constrained optimization problem to changes in the auxiliary parameters. Foundational assumptions for HDSA require satisfaction of the optimality conditions which are not always practically feasible as a result of ill-posedness in the inverse problem. We introduce novel theoretical and computational approaches to justify and enable HDSA for ill-posed inverse problems by projecting the sensitivities on likelihood informed subspaces and defining a posteriori updates. Our proposed framework is demonstrated on a nonlinear multi-physics inverse problem motivated by estimation of spatially heterogenous material properties in the presence of spatially distributed parametric modeling uncertainties.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: in ill - posed inverse problems constrained by partial differential equations (PDEs), how to evaluate the influence of auxiliary parameters on the optimal solution. Specifically, when facing the challenges brought by high - dimensional parameter spaces and computational complexity, how to understand the impact of fixing certain parameters (i.e., auxiliary parameters) on the final solution result through hyper - differential sensitivity analysis (HDSA).
### Detailed Explanation:
1. **Background Problem**:
- **Inverse Problems Constrained by PDEs**: In many scientific and engineering applications, we cannot directly observe certain physical quantities, but instead estimate these physical quantities by observing related quantities. For example, in material property estimation, we may only be able to infer the internal properties of materials by measuring certain physical phenomena (such as fluid flow).
- **High - Dimensional Parameter Spaces and Computational Complexity**: When there are multiple uncertain parameters in the model, especially when these parameters are spatio - temporally distributed, the problem becomes very complex. At the same time, solving PDEs themselves is also a computationally intensive task.
2. **Simplification Method**:
- **Fixing Auxiliary Parameters**: To simplify the problem, the common practice is to fix some parameters (called auxiliary parameters) to the best - estimated values, and then use PDE - constrained optimization techniques to estimate other parameters. This can reduce the parameter dimension and improve the numerical condition, but ignores the dependencies between parameters.
3. **Research Objective**:
- **Hyper - Differential Sensitivity Analysis (HDSA)**: This paper introduces HDSA to evaluate the impact of changes in auxiliary parameters on the solutions of PDE - constrained optimization problems. HDSA provides a computationally scalable method to analyze uncertainty by differentiating the optimality conditions and combining adjoint derivative calculations and randomized matrix - free linear algebra.
4. **Theoretical and Computational Challenges**:
- **Ill - Posed Problems**: Due to the high parameter dimension and sparse data, even if the auxiliary parameters are fixed, large - scale PDE - constrained inverse problems may still be ill - posed. This ill - posedness makes it difficult to satisfy the optimality conditions, thus limiting the application of HDSA.
- **Solutions**: This paper proposes new theoretical and computational methods, including defining HDSA on the likelihood information subspace, developing first - order and second - order posterior update methods, and providing an algorithm framework to overcome these challenges.
### Summary:
The main objective of this paper is to enable HDSA to be effectively applied in ill - posed PDE - constrained inverse problems by introducing new theoretical and computational methods, so as to better understand and evaluate the influence of auxiliary parameters on the optimal solution. This not only helps to improve model development and calibration, but also supports more effective data collection strategies.
### Formula Examples (Markdown Format):
- **Objective Function**:
\[
J(z; \theta) := M(z, \theta) + R(z)
\]
where,
\[
M(z, \theta) = \frac{1}{2} (F(z, \theta) - d)^T W (F(z, \theta) - d)
\]
\(M(z, \theta)\) is the weighted data error term, and \(R(z)\) is the regularization term.
- **Optimality Conditions**:
\[
\nabla_z J(z^*; \theta) = 0
\]
\[
\nabla_{z,z} J(z^*; \theta) \text{ is positive definite}
\]
- **Hyper - Differential Sensitivity Index**:
\[
S_i = \| P H^{-1} B e_i \|_{W_z}
\]
where \(e_i\) is the \(i\) - th standard basis vector, \(P\) is the projection operator, \(H\) is the Hessian matrix, and \(B\) is the Jacobian matrix of the gradient.
Hopefully, this summary can help you understand the core problem of the paper and its solution methods.