Abstract:Treatment effect estimation from observational data is a critical research topic across many domains. The foremost challenge in treatment effect estimation is how to capture hidden confounders. Recently, the growing availability of networked observational data offers a new opportunity to deal with the issue of hidden confounders. Unlike networked data in traditional graph learning tasks, such as node classification and link detection, the networked data under the causal inference problem has its particularity, i.e., imbalanced network structure. In this paper, we propose a Graph Infomax Adversarial Learning (GIAL) model for treatment effect estimation, which makes full use of the network structure to capture more information by recognizing the imbalance in network structure. We evaluate the performance of our GIAL model on two benchmark datasets, and the results demonstrate superiority over the state-of-the-art methods.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to solve the challenges faced when estimating treatment effects from observational data, especially how to capture hidden confounders. Specifically, the paper focuses on the problem of causal inference in networked observational data. Unlike traditional graph learning tasks (such as node classification and link prediction), networked observational data has an unbalanced network structure in causal inference problems. This imbalance exists not only in the distribution of feature variables but also in the network structure. #### Main problems: 1. **Identification of hidden confounders**: - In observational data, treatment assignment is not random, resulting in the existence of hidden confounders that simultaneously affect treatment assignment and outcomes. - The existence of hidden confounders makes it difficult to estimate counterfactual outcomes, thereby increasing the difficulty of causal inference. 2. **Unbalanced network structure**: - The imbalance in the network structure means that nodes within the same group are more likely to be connected to each other, which exacerbates the imbalance in the representation space and makes traditional graph neural network methods unable to fully utilize network information. #### Solutions: To solve these problems, the authors propose a method based on Graph Infomax Adversarial Learning (GIAL), which can: - **Utilize network structure**: By maximizing the structure mutual information, it helps graph neural networks better extract hidden confounders in networked observational data. - **Balance representation distribution**: Use adversarial learning to balance the learning representation distributions of the treatment group and the control group and generate the potential outcomes of each unit in both groups. - **Improve prediction accuracy**: Through adversarial training, reduce the bias caused by imbalance, thereby improving the prediction accuracy of potential outcomes. #### Experimental verification: The authors evaluated the performance of the GIAL model on two benchmark datasets (BlogCatalog and Flickr), and the results show that this model outperforms existing methods in estimating the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) and the Individual Treatment Effect (ITE). #### Formula summary: - **Individual Treatment Effect (ITE)**: \[ ITE_i = Y_i^1 - Y_i^0, \quad (i = 1,\ldots,n) \] - **Average Treatment Effect (ATE)**: \[ ATE=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i = 1}^{n}(Y_i^1 - Y_i^0), \quad (i = 1,\ldots,n) \] - **Structure mutual information maximization objective function**: \[ L_m=\frac{1}{2n}\left(\sum_{i = 1}^{n}\mathbb{E}_{(X,A)}[\log d(r_i, s)]+\sum_{j = 1}^{n}\mathbb{E}_{(\tilde{X},A)}[\log(1 - d(\tilde{r}_i, s))]\right) \] - **Potential outcome generator loss function**: \[ L_\Psi=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i = 1}^{N}(\hat{y}_f^i - y_f^i)^2 \] - **Counterfactual outcome discriminator loss function**: \[ L_{\Phi,\Psi}=-\frac{1}{2n}\sum_{t = 0}^{1}\sum_{i = 1}^{n}\left(p_{truth,t}^i\log(p_{t}^i)+(1 - p_{truth,t}^i)\log(1 - p_{t}^i)\right) \] Through these methods and formulas, the GIAL model can operate in an unbalanced network structure.

Graph Infomax Adversarial Learning for Treatment Effect Estimation with Networked Observational Data

Estimation of individual causal effects in network setup for multiple treatments

Graph Disentangle Causal Model: Enhancing Causal Inference in Networked Observational Data

Treatment-Aware Hyperbolic Representation Learning for Causal Effect Estimation with Social Networks

Invariant Graph Learning for Causal Effect Estimation

Deep treatment-adaptive network for causal inference

Estimating Peer Direct and Indirect Effects in Observational Network Data

GraphITE: Estimating Individual Effects of Graph-structured Treatments

Adversarial Balancing-based Representation Learning for Causal Effect Inference with Observational Data

Neural Networks with Causal Graph Constraints: A New Approach for Treatment Effects Estimation

Multi-Task Adversarial Learning for Treatment Effect Estimation in Basket Trials

Model-Based Inference and Experimental Design for Interference Using Partial Network Data

Adversarially Balanced Representation for Continuous Treatment Effect Estimation

A-GCL: Adversarial graph contrastive learning for fMRI analysis to diagnose neurodevelopmental disorders

Imbalanced Graph-Level Anomaly Detection via Counterfactual Augmentation and Feature Learning

Graph neural network-based subgraph analysis for predicting adverse drug events

Causal Inference under Networked Interference and Intervention Policy Enhancement

Doubly Robust Causal Effect Estimation under Networked Interference via Targeted Learning

DESCN: Deep Entire Space Cross Networks for Individual Treatment Effect Estimation

Adversarial Graph Augmentation to Improve Graph Contrastive Learning

A Look into Causal Effects under Entangled Treatment in Graphs: Investigating the Impact of Contact on MRSA Infection