Abstract:Ranking and selection (R&S) aims to select the best alternative with the largest mean performance from a finite set of alternatives. Recently, considerable attention has turned toward the large-scale R&S problem which involves a large number of alternatives. Ideal large-scale R&S procedures should be sample optimal; that is, the total sample size required to deliver an asymptotically nonzero probability of correct selection (PCS) grows at the minimal order (linear order) in the number of alternatives, k. Surprisingly, we discover that the naïve greedy procedure, which keeps sampling the alternative with the largest running average, performs strikingly well and appears sample optimal. To understand this discovery, we develop a new boundary-crossing perspective and prove that the greedy procedure is sample optimal for the scenarios where the best mean maintains at least a positive constant away from all other means as k increases. We further show that the derived PCS lower bound is asymptotically tight for the slippage configuration of means with a common variance. For other scenarios, we consider the probability of good selection and find that the result depends on the growth behavior of the number of good alternatives: if it remains bounded as k increases, the sample optimality still holds; otherwise, the result may change. Moreover, we propose the explore-first greedy procedures by adding an exploration phase to the greedy procedure. The procedures are proven to be sample optimal and consistent under the same assumptions. Last, we numerically investigate the performance of our greedy procedures in solving large-scale R&S problems. This paper was accepted by Baris Ata, stochastic models and simulation. Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72091211, 72071146, 72161160340]. Supplemental Material: The e-companion and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.00694 .

Optimality of the recursive Neyman allocation

Another Solution for Some Optimum Allocation Problem

Spatial Variability-Based Sample Size Allocation for Stratified Sampling

Variance-Optimal Offline and Streaming Stratified Random Sampling

The (surprising) Sample Optimality of Greedy Procedures for Large-Scale Ranking and Selection

An Optimal Sample Allocation Strategy for Partition-Based Random Search.

Optimal Allocation Under Anticipated Nonresponse

Myopic Allocation Policy with Asymptotically Optimal Sampling Rate.

An example of application of optimal sample allocation in a finite population

Asymptotically best response-adaptive randomization procedures☆

On the implementation of stratified two-stage simple random sampling without replacement, with possible collapsed strata

Gradient-Based Myopic Allocation Policy: an Efficient Sampling Procedure in a Low-Confidence Scenario.

Optimal Treatment Allocation under Constraints

On the Performance of the Neyman Allocation with Small Pilots

Treatment Allocation with Strategic Agents

Optimal refinement of strata to balance covariates

Online Submodular Welfare Maximization Meets Post-Allocation Stochasticity and Reusability

Yankee Swap: a Fast and Simple Fair Allocation Mechanism for Matroid Rank Valuations

A Risk-Averse Stochastic Approximation of the Optimal Allocation of Active Redundancies to Coherent Systems.

Autoregressive Policy Optimization for Constrained Allocation Tasks

Variable Neighborhood Searching Rerandomization