Copyright in Generative Deep Learning

Giorgio Franceschelli,Mirco Musolesi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2022.10

2021-09-22

Abstract:Machine-generated artworks are now part of the contemporary art scene: they are attracting significant investments and they are presented in exhibitions together with those created by human artists. These artworks are mainly based on generative deep learning techniques, which have seen a formidable development and remarkable refinement in the very recent years. Given the inherent characteristics of these techniques, a series of novel legal problems arise. In this article, we consider a set of key questions in the area of generative deep learning for the arts, including the following: is it possible to use copyrighted works as training set for generative models? How do we legally store their copies in order to perform the training process? Who (if someone) will own the copyright on the generated data? We try to answer these questions considering the law in force in both the United States of America and the European Union, and potential future alternatives. We then extend our analysis to code generation, which is an emerging area of generative deep learning. Finally, we also formulate a set of practical guidelines for artists and developers working on deep learning generated art, as well as some policy suggestions for policymakers.

Computers and Society,Artificial Intelligence,Machine Learning

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is the copyright issues arising from generative adversarial networks (GANs) and other generative deep - learning techniques in the field of artistic creation. Specifically, the article explores the following key issues:

1. **Can copyrighted works be used as the training set for the generative model?**
- Generative deep - learning models require a large amount of data for training, and this data may include copyrighted artworks. Therefore, the authors explore how to legally use these works within the legal framework.

2. **How can these copyrighted works be legally stored to complete the training process?**
- During the training process, the model needs to store these works in memory. This involves the issues of temporary copying and storage. Especially under the legal frameworks of different countries (such as the United States and the European Union), how to ensure that this storage behavior does not infringe copyright.

3. **Who owns the copyright of the generated data?**
- Should the new works generated by generative deep - learning models be protected by copyright? If so, who should the copyright of these new works belong to? Is it the developer, the original author of the training data, or other entities?

4. **Policy recommendations and practical guidelines**
- In response to the above issues, the author also provides practical suggestions and guidelines for artists, developers, and policy - makers to help them better understand and comply with relevant laws and regulations in this emerging field.

To answer these questions, the authors analyze the current legal frameworks in the United States and the European Union and discuss possible alternative solutions in the future. In addition, they also extend the analysis to the field of code generation, which is also an emerging application direction of generative deep - learning. In this way, the article not only provides an in - depth understanding of the current legal situation but also puts forward constructive opinions for future policy - making and technological development.

### Summary
The main purpose of this paper is to explore the copyright issues of generative deep - learning techniques in artistic creation and provide a comprehensive legal and technical perspective to help all parties better cope with these challenges.