Abstract:The $\Lambda$CDM model faces several tensions with recent cosmological data and their increased accuracy. The mismatch between the values of the Hubble constant $H_0$ obtained from direct distance ladder measurements and from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is the most statistically significant, but the amplitude of the matter fluctuations is also regarded as a serious concern, leading to the investigation of a plethora of models. We first show that the combination of several recent measurements from local probes leads to a tight constraint on the present-day matter density $\Omega_M$ as well as on the amplitude of the matter fluctuations, both acceptably consistent with the values inferred from the CMB. Secondly, we show that the data on cosmic chronometers allow to derive an accurate value of the Hubble constant $H_0$ for $\Lambda$CDM models: $H_0 = 67.4 \pm 1.34$ km/s/Mpc. This implies that, within $\Lambda$CDM, some determinations of $H_0$ are biased. Considering a bias on the Hubble constant as a nuisance parameter within $\Lambda$CDM, we examine such a $\Lambda$CDM$+ H_0$ bias model on the same statistical grounds as alternative cosmological models. We show that the former statistically supersede most existing extended models proposed up to now. In a third step, we show that the value of $\Omega_M$ we obtained, combined with $H_0$ from SH0ES, leads to an accurate measurement of $\omega_M$, providing an additional low-redshift test for cosmological models. From this test, most extensions seem to be confronted with a new tension, whereas the $\Lambda$CDM with $H_0 \sim 67 $ has none. We conclude that a standard $\Lambda$CDM model with an unknown bias in the Cepheids distance calibration represents a model that reaches a remarkable agreement, statistically better than previously proposed extensions with $H_0 \sim 73 $ for which such a comparison can be performed. (abridged)

The Hubble Constant in the Axi-Higgs Universe

$Λ$CDM is alive and well

Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics

A tale of two double quasars: Hubble constant tension or biases?

Measuring Hubble constant in an anisotropic extension of $Λ$CDM model

Investigating The Hubble Tension Through Hubble Parameter Data

No-go guide for the Hubble tension: late-time or local-scale new physics

The Cosmic Microwave Background and $H_0$

Cosmographic view on the $H_0$ and $σ_8$ tensions

Interacting dark energy axions in light of the Hubble tension

Probing Cosmic Background Dynamics with a Cosmological-model-independent Method

$H_0$-tension in the classical limit of Big Bang quantum cosmology

A void in the Hubble tension? The end of the line for the Hubble bubble

Testing the consistency of early and late cosmological parameters with BAO and CMB data

A bias using the ages of the oldest astrophysical objects to address the Hubble tension

Dark energy and matter interacting scenario to relieve $H_0$ and $S_8$ tensions

BAO+BBN revisited -- Growing the Hubble tension with a 0.7km/s/Mpc constraint

$Λ_{\rm s}$CDM model: A promising scenario for alleviation of cosmological tensions

The trouble with $H_0$