Binding Peptide-Guided Immobilization of Lipases with Significantly Improved Catalytic Performance Using Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) Biofilms as a Platform
Hao Dong,Wenxue Zhang,Qize Xuan,Yao Zhou,Shengmin Zhou,Jiaofang Huang,Ping Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c18298
2021-01-27
Abstract:Developing novel immobilization methods to maximize the catalytic performance of enzymes has been a permanent pursuit of scientific researchers. Engineered <i>Escherichia coli</i> biofilms have attracted great concern as surface display platforms for enzyme immobilization. However, current biological conjugation methods, such as the SpyTag/SpyCatcher tagging pair, that immobilize enzymes onto <i>E. coli</i> biofilms seriously hamper enzymatic performance. Through phage display screening of lipase-binding peptides (LBPs) and co-expression of CsgB (nucleation protein of curli nanofibers) and LBP2-modified CsgA (CsgALBP2, major structural subunit of curli nanofibers) proteins, we developed <i>E. coli</i> BL21::ΔCsgA-CsgB-CsgALBP2 (LBP2-functionalized) biofilms as surface display platforms to maximize the catalytic performance of lipase (Lip181). After immobilization onto LBP2-functionalized biofilm materials, Lip181 showed increased thermostability, pH, and storage stability. Surprisingly, the relative activity of immobilized Lip181 increased from 8.43 to 11.33 U/mg through this immobilization strategy. Furthermore, the highest loading of lipase on LBP2-functionalized biofilm materials reached up to 27.90 mg/g of wet biofilm materials, equivalent to 210.49 mg/g of dry biofilm materials, revealing their potential as a surface with high enzyme loading capacity. Additionally, immobilized Lip181 was used to hydrolyze phthalic acid esters, and the hydrolysis rate against dibutyl phthalate was up to 100%. Thus, LBP2-mediated immobilization of lipases was demonstrated to be far more advantageous than the traditional SpyTag/SpyCatcher strategy in maximizing enzymatic performance, thereby providing a better alternative for enzyme immobilization onto <i>E. coli</i> biofilms.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acsami.0c18298?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.0c18298</a>.Primers used in this study; optimized nucleotide sequences of LBP1–LBP5; binding energy between Lip181 and PAEs; agarose gel electrophoresis analysis; integrity analysis of <i>csgBAC</i> and <i>csgDEFG</i> operons; DNA marker; PCR results of <i>csgBAC</i> operon, <i>csgDEFG</i> operon, and <i>csgA</i> knockout; control; DNA marker; PCR determination of positive colonies; FE-SEM results of BL21::ΔCsgA and BL21::ΔCsgA-CsgASpyTag biofilms; BL21::ΔCsgA biofilms and BL21::ΔCsgA-CsgASpyTag biofilms; detection of lipase activity after Lip181SpyCatcher immobilization: BL21 biofilms; BL21::ΔCsgA biofilms; and BL21::ΔCsgA-CsgASpyTag biofilms; TEM results of BL21::ΔCsgA-CsgASpyTag biofilms; cells without attached nanofibers; free and tangled nanofibers; purification and determination of lipase activity; purification of Lip181 and Lip181SpyCatcher: Lane 1, purified Lip181; lane 2, purified Lip181SpyCatcher; comparison of lipase activity between Lip181 and Lip181SpyCatcher; comparison of lipase activity between free and immobilized Lip181SpyCatcher; morphological results of LBP2-functionalized biofilms after cultivation for 48 h; FE-SEM results; TEM results; morphological results of LBP2-functionalized biofilms after treatment with pH 2.2 glycine-HCl buffers (0.2 M); FE-SEM results; TEM results; purification of AzoRed2: Lane 1 and 2, purified AzoRed2; enzyme loading of BL21::ΔCsgA-CsgALBP2 biofilm materials; and molecular structures of PAEs (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsami.0c18298/suppl_file/am0c18298_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
materials science, multidisciplinary,nanoscience & nanotechnology