Abstract:p.125 The outbreak of COVID-19 has become the biggest crisis for the world since World War II and there is little doubt that the world has entered a global economic recession. Currently, there are more than 2,160,000 confirmed cases and more than 145,000 deaths across the world (JHU, 2020). The impact of this pandemic is dramatic: cities or countries are in lockdown, factories or stores are shut down, and bars and schools are closed. Coronavirus has led to an astonishing shutdown of economic activity, which would lower energy use, just as every recession did in the history. The 2008 financial crisis and the Great Recession that followed, had a profound effect on the energy sectors in the world, with decreasing the price of crude oil from about $150/bbl. to $35/bbl. in only a few months. Many economists expect that the COVID-19 pandemic would have a much larger effect on economic activity than the 2008 financial crisis. Therefore, it would be important to quantitatively investigate what this pandemic implies for the energy market and low-carbon transition for different regions as well as the whole world. The typical approach, i.e., input–output (IO) models have been used widely to examine the effect of economic crisis or policies in response to the crisis. For instance, David et al. (1995) used a 10-sector input–output model of the UK to simulate the effects of a variety of policies issues connected with energy use and environmental impacts; and the short-term economic damage of the novel virus outbreak has also been estimated based on such methods (Duan et al., 2020). However, the IO models fail to consider the optimization or adjustments that the economy can reach by its own in response to the crisis. Further, the changes in dynamic interactions among various countries resulting from the crisis are beyond the capability of the I-O model framework. In contrast, computable general equilibrium (CGE) models have the benefits of enabling active adjustments by consumers, producers, or policy makers, and thus they have been used to generate insights into the impacts of economic crises (see, e.g., Burfisher, 2017; Cui et al., 2019). With regarding to the impact of the epidemic, it would be valuable to capture the roles of the supply chains and international trades, given the increasing trends of globalization (Mukhopadhyay and Thomassin, 2009). In this context, we use a dynamic version of the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model, in this paper, to see how the COVID-19 pandemic has affect the energy transition and carbon emissions across countries, where one is able to see the dynamic effect of this pandemic. According to the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, we re-divided the world of the GTAP model into 7 regions, i.e., China, the U.S., European Union (28 countries included, EU_28), Japan, South Korea (SKorea), the Middle East and North Africa (MES), and rest of world (ROW). We consider epidemic shocks for all the regions from both production and consumption sides, and three scenarios are designed, i.e., the Base-case scenario, the Conservative scenario and Pessimistic scenario. Based on the historical economic, energy and carbon emission data, we calibrate the GTAP model and project the critical indicators in 2020; then mpacts of the pandemic are measured by comparing the corresponding results under the epidemic shocks with the 2020 projections. Under the Base-case scenario, the pandemic will damage the world economy by 2.1%; given the 2.9% projection without epidemic, the real GDP growth of 2020 could be 0.8%, which is largely in line with the estimate of the IHS Markit (Behravesh and Johnson, 2020). As for China and the US, the negative shocks to economy reach 2.6% and 2.4%, which are Coronavirus Pandemic: Opportunities and Challenges for Energy and Low-carbon Transition

The impact of past pandemics on CO$_2$ emissions and transition to renewable energy

Impacts of COVID-19 and Fiscal Stimuli on Global Emissions and the Paris Agreement

Analysis of the Impact of Energy Use on CO2 Emissions: Before, During, and Post-Covid-19

Coronavirus Pandemic : Opportunities and Challenges for Energy and Low-carbon Transition

The negative impact of the COVID-19 on renewable energy growth in developing countries: Underestimated

De-carbonization of global energy use during the COVID-19 pandemic

Unintended consequences of COVID-19 public policy responses on renewable energy power: evidence from OECD countries in the EU

Global low-carbon energy transition in the post-COVID-19 era

Towards Near-Real Time Air Pollutant and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Lessons Learned from Multiple Estimates During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Revealing the energy paradox: Assessing the asymmetric impact of pandemic uncertainty on consumption of renewable and nonrenewable energy

Coronavirus Pandemic: Opportunities or Challenges for Energy Transition?

Markov chain-based impact analysis of the pandemic Covid-19 outbreak on global primary energy consumption mix

Effects of electricity demand reductions under a carbon pricing regime on emissions: lessons from COVID-19

Towards smart energy systems – A survey about the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on renewable energy research

Inter-regional environmental inequality under lasting pandemic exacerbated by residential response

COVID-19 causes record decline in global CO2 emissions

Are renewable energies on a sustained path? Analysis of selected case-studies from the pre-pandemic-era

What Can We Learn from the 2008 Financial Crisis for Global Power Decarbonization after COVID-19?

Impact Analysis of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Future Green Power Sector: A Case Study in the Netherlands.

Preventing carbon emission retaliatory rebound post-COVID-19 requires expanding free trade and improving energy efficiency

Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the global energy system and the shift progress to renewable energy: Opportunities, challenges, and policy implications