Distinct chemistries explain decoupling of slip and wettability in atomically smooth aqueous interfaces

Anthony R. Poggioli,David T. Limmer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.09973

2021-08-29

Abstract:Despite essentially identical crystallography and equilibrium structuring of water, nanoscopic channels composed of hexagonal boron nitride and graphite exhibit an order-of-magnitude difference in fluid slip. We investigate this difference using molecular dynamics simulations, demonstrating that its origin is in the distinct chemistries of the two materials. In particular, the presence of polar bonds in hexagonal boron nitride, absent in graphite, leads to Coulombic interactions between the polar water molecules and the wall. We demonstrate that this interaction is manifested in a large typical lateral force experienced by a layer of oriented hydrogen atoms in the vicinity of the wall, leading to the enhanced friction in hexagonal boron nitride. The fluid adhesion to the wall is dominated by dispersive forces in both materials, leading to similar wettabilities. Our results rationalize recent observations that the difference in frictional characteristics of graphite and hexagonal boron nitride cannot be explained on the basis of the minor differences in their wettabilities.

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics,Statistical Mechanics,Chemical Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: although graphene (graphite, GR) and hexagonal boron nitride (hexagonal boron nitride, HBN) are almost identical in crystal structure and have similar water wettability, there are significant differences in their fluid slip characteristics in nano - channels. Specifically, the slip length of HBN is one order of magnitude smaller than that of GR. This difference cannot be explained by the traditional wettability difference, so it is necessary to understand the physical mechanism behind it at the molecular level.

### Core problems of the paper
1. **Differences in slip characteristics**: Why do HBN and GR have such a large difference in slip length when their wettability is similar?
2. **Molecular mechanism**: How do the different chemical properties of these materials affect the interaction between the fluid and the solid interface, thus leading to the differences in slip characteristics?

### Solutions
The paper studied the fluid behavior in HBN and GR nano - channels through molecular dynamics simulations and revealed the following points:

- **The role of polar bonds**: The polar bonds (such as B - N bonds) present in HBN lead to Coulomb interactions with water molecules, while there are no such polar bonds in graphene.
- **Changes in lateral forces**: The lateral force fluctuations on the hydrogen atom layer in HBN are much larger than those in graphene, which increases the frictional force.
- **Dominant factors of adsorption forces**: The adsorption forces of the two materials are mainly controlled by dispersive forces (dispersive forces), so their wettability is similar.
- **Estimation of slip length**: By calculating parameters such as permeability, mobility and wall - force autocorrelation function, the slip lengths of HBN and GR were estimated, and the experimental results were verified.

### Formula summary
The key formulas involved in the paper include:

1. **Partial - slip boundary condition**:
\[
\langle u \rangle_{\text{wall}} = b \left. \frac{\partial \langle u \rangle}{\partial z} \right|_{\text{wall}}
\]
where \( b \) is the slip length.

2. **Definitions of mobility and hydraulic conductivity**:
\[
M(z) = \frac{\langle u(z) \rangle}{-\partial_x p} = \beta V \int_0^{t_N} dt \langle u(z,t) U(0) \rangle
\]
\[
L = \frac{\langle U \rangle}{-\partial_x p} = \frac{1}{L} \int_0^L dz M(z) = \beta V \int_0^{t_N} dt C_{UU}(t)
\]

3. **Green - Kubo relationship of the interfacial friction coefficient**:
\[
\lambda = \beta \frac{1}{A} \int_0^{t_N} dt C_{FF}(t) = \beta \frac{\langle F_{\text{wall}}^2 \rangle}{\tau_F(t_N)}
\]

4. **Relationship between slip length and interfacial friction coefficient**:
\[
\lambda = \frac{\eta}{b}
\]

Through these analyses, the paper reveals that the fundamental differences in slip characteristics between HBN and GR originate from their different chemical properties. In particular, the polar bonds in HBN lead to stronger lateral force fluctuations, thereby increasing the frictional force.