Abstract:Machine learning methods have been recently applied to learning phases of matter and transitions between them. Of particular interest is the topological phase transition, such as in the XY model, whose critical points can be difficult to be obtained by using unsupervised learning, such as the principal component analysis. Recently, the authors of [Nat. Phys. 15, 790 (2019)] employed the diffusion map method for identifying topological orders and were able to determine the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) phase transition of the XY model, specifically via the intersection of the average cluster distance (D) over bar and the within-cluster dispersion parameter (sigma) over bar (when the different clusters vary from separation to mixing together). However, sometimes it is not easy to find the intersection if (D) over bar or (sigma) over bar does not change too much due to topological constraint. In this paper, we propose to use the Calinski-Harabaz (ch) index, defined roughly as the ratio (D) over bar / (sigma) over bar, to determine the critical points at which the ch index reaches a maximum or minimum value or jumps sharply. We examine the ch index in several statistical models, including ones that contain a BKT phase transition. For the Ising model, the peaks of the quantity ch or its components are consistent with the position of the specific-heat maximum. For the XY model, both on the square and on the honeycomb lattices, our results of the ch index show the convergence of the peaks over a range of parameters epsilon/epsilon(0) in the Gaussian kernel. We also examine the generalized XY model with q = 2 and q = 8 and study the phase transition using the fractional 1/2-vortex or 1/8-vortex constraint, respectively. The global phase diagram can be obtained by our method, which does not use the label of configuration needed by supervised learning, nor a crossing from two curves (D) over bar and (sigma) over bar. Our method is, thus, useful to both topological and nontopological phase transitions and can achieve accuracy as good as supervised learning methods previously used in these models and may be used for searching phases from experimental data.

Identifying Topological Phase Transitions in Experiments Using Manifold Learning

Topological quantum phase transitions retrieved through unsupervised machine learning

Unsupervised machine learning of topological phase transitions from experimental data

Unsupervised Learning of Interacting Topological Phases from Experimental Observables

Deep learning of topological phase transitions from entanglement aspects: An unsupervised way

Unsupervised Learning of Non-Hermitian Topological Phases

Unsupervised identification of Floquet topological phase boundaries

Unsupervised Learning of Non-Hermitian Photonic Bulk Topology

Distance between two manifolds, topological phase transitions and scaling laws

Unsupervised Learning of Topological Phase Transitions Using the Calinski-Harabaz Index

Unsupervised machine learning of quantum phase transitions using diffusion maps

Game Theory and Topological Phase Transition

Machine Learning Topological States

Unifying Topological Phase Transitions in Non-Interacting, Interacting, and Periodically Driven Systems

A machine learning approach to drawing phase diagrams of topological lasing modes

Topological phases in discrete stochastic systems

Self-organizing maps as a method for detecting phase transitions and phase identification

Phase Transitions Driven by Topological Excitations and Their Tensor Network Approach

Disorder Induced Phase Transition in Magnetic Higher-Order Topological Insulator: A Machine Learning Study

Machine Learning Topological Phases with a Solid-State Quantum Simulator.

Observing multifarious topological phase transitions with real-space indicator