Live-cell imaging reveals the trade-off between target search flexibility and efficiency for Cas9 and Cas12a
Lorenzo Olivi,Cleo Bagchus,Victor Pool,Ezra Bekkering,Konstantin Speckner,Hidde Offerhaus,Wen Y Wu,Martin Depken,Koen J A Martens,Raymond H J Staals,Johannes Hohlbein,Wen Y Wu,Koen J A Martens,Raymond H J Staals
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae283
IF: 14.9
2024-04-23
Nucleic Acids Research
Abstract:CRISPR-Cas systems have widely been adopted as genome editing tools, with two frequently employed Cas nucleases being Spy Cas9 and Lb Cas12a. Although both nucleases use RNA guides to find and cleave target DNA sites, the two enzymes differ in terms of protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) requirements, guide architecture and cleavage mechanism. In the last years, rational engineering led to the creation of PAM-relaxed variants Sp RYCas9 and imp Lb Cas12a to broaden the targetable DNA space. By employing their catalytically inactive variants (dCas9/dCas12a), we quantified how the protein-specific characteristics impact the target search process. To allow quantification, we fused these nucleases to the photoactivatable fluorescent protein PAmCherry2.1 and performed single-particle tracking in cells of Escherichia coli . From our tracking analysis, we derived kinetic parameters for each nuclease with a non-targeting RNA guide, strongly suggesting that interrogation of DNA by Lb dCas12a variants proceeds faster than that of Spy dCas9. In the presence of a targeting RNA guide, both simulations and imaging of cells confirmed that Lb dCas12a variants are faster and more efficient in finding a specific target site. Our work demonstrates the trade-off of relaxing PAM requirements in Spy dCas9 and Lb dCas12a using a powerful framework, which can be applied to other nucleases to quantify their DNA target search.
biochemistry & molecular biology