Abstract:Technical question and answer Q&A platforms, such as Stack Overflow, provide a platform for users to ask and answer questions about a wide variety of programming topics. These platforms accumulate a large amount of knowledge, including hundreds of thousands lines of source code. Developers can benefit from the source code that is attached to the questions and answers on Q&A platforms by copying or learning from (parts of) it. By understanding how developers utilize source code from Q&A platforms, we can provide insights for researchers which can be used to improve next-generation Q&A platforms to help developers reuse source code fast and easily. In this paper, we first conduct an exploratory study on 289 files from 182 open-source projects, which contain source code that has an explicit reference to a Stack Overflow post. Our goal is to understand how developers utilize code from Q&A platforms and to reveal barriers that may make code reuse more difficult. In 31.5% of the studied files, developers needed to modify source code from Stack Overflow to make it work in their own projects. The degree of required modification varied from simply renaming variables to rewriting the whole algorithm. Developers sometimes chose to implement an algorithm from scratch based on the descriptions from Stack Overflow answers, even if there was an implementation readily available in the post. In 35.5% of the studied files, developers used Stack Overflow posts as an information source for later reference. To further understand the barriers of reusing code and to obtain suggestions for improving the code reuse process on Q&A platforms, we conducted a survey with 453 open-source developers who are also on Stack Overflow. We found that the top 3 barriers that make it difficult for developers to reuse code from Stack Overflow are: (1) too much code modification required to fit in their projects, (2) incomprehensive code, and (3) low code quality. We summarized and analyzed all survey responses and we identified that developers suggest improvements for future Q&A platforms along the following dimensions: code quality, information enhancement & management, data organization, license, and the human factor. For instance, developers suggest to improve the code quality by adding an integrated validator that can test source code online, and an outdated code detection mechanism. Our findings can be used as a roadmap for researchers and developers to improve code reuse.

Tracking Hackathon Code Creation and Reuse

The Secret Life of Hackathon Code

One-off Events? An Empirical Study of Hackathon Code Creation and Reuse

The Developers' Design Thinking Toolbox in Hackathons: A Study on the Recurring Design Methods in Software Development Marathons

An empirical study of code reuse between GitHub and stack overflow during software development

Dataset: Copy-based Reuse in Open Source Software

Towards Exploring the Code Reuse from Stack Overflow during Software Development

The 2nd Workshop on Hacking and Making at Time-Bounded Events

Virtual design hackathons: a data collection framework

An Exploratory Study on the Evidence of Hackathons' Role in Solving OSS Newcomers' Challenges

Can participation in a hackathon impact the motivation of software engineering students? A preliminary case study analysis

Large-Scale Code Reuse in Open Source Software

How do developers utilize source code from stack overflow?

Code Duplication and Reuse in Jupyter Notebooks

How to organize a hackathon -- A planning kit

Learnings and Implications of Virtual Hackathon.

Tracing Vulnerable Code Lineage

On Code Reuse from StackOverflow: an Exploratory Study on Jupyter Notebook

Socio-technical constraints and affordances of virtual collaboration -- A study of four online hackathons

Hackathons for Driving Service Innovation Strategies: The Evolution of a Digital Platform-Based Ecosystem

Designing an Effective Hackathon via University-Industry Collaboration for Data Science Education