Abstract:This paper studies a fundamental mechanism by which conflicts between arguments are drawn from sentiments regarding acceptability of the arguments. Given sets of arguments, an inverse abstract argumentation problem seeks attack relations between arguments such that acceptability semantics interprets each argument in the sets of arguments as being acceptable in each of the attack relations. It is an inverse problem of the traditional problem we refer to as the forward abstract argumentation problem. Given an attack relation, the forward abstract argumentation problem seeks sets of arguments such that acceptability semantics interprets each argument in the sets of arguments as being acceptable in the attack relation. We give a probabilistic model of argumentation-theoretic inference. It is a generative model formalising the process by which acceptability semantics interprets acceptability of arguments in a given attack relation. We show that it gives a broad view of solutions to the forward and inverse abstract argumentation problems. Specifically, solutions to the inverse and forward abstract argumentation problems are shown to be equivalent to a maximum likelihood estimate and maximum likelihood prediction, respectively, which are both available with the generative model. In addition, they are shown to be special cases of the posterior distribution and the evidence, respectively, which are both obtained by probabilistic inference on the generative model. We report an experiment result and application example of the generative model in the inverse problems.

Aggregating Bipolar Opinions (With Appendix)

Non-flat ABA is an Instance of Bipolar Argumentation

Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks with a dual relation between defeat and defence

Partial Semantics of Argumentation: Basic Properties and Empirical

A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: Definition, properties, and examples of application.

Instantiations and Computational Aspects of Non-Flat Assumption-based Argumentation

A Bayesian Approach to Forward and Inverse Abstract Argumentation Problems

Integrating Individual Preferences into Collective Argumentation

A Bayesian Approach to Direct and Inverse Abstract Argumentation Problems

Argument Attribution Explanations in Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (Technical Report)

Block Argumentation

Bisimulation Between Base Argumentation and Premise-Conclusion Argumentation

Cyclic Supports in Recursive Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks: Semantics and LP Mapping

Towards a Benchmark of Natural Language Arguments

Extending Modular Semantics for Bipolar Weighted Argumentation (Technical Report)

Some Options for Instantiation of Bipolar Argument Graphs with Deductive Arguments

Toward Incremental Computation of Argumentation Semantics: A Decomposition-Based Approach

Experimental Assessment of Aggregation Principles in Argumentation-enabled Collective Intelligence

On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. A correction and extension to Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method.

Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation Based on SCC Decomposability

Partial Semantics of Argumentation