The VAR at Risk

Alfred Galichon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219024910005875

2021-02-04

Abstract:I show that the structure of the firm is not neutral in respect to regulatory capital budgeted under rules which are based on the Value-at-Risk.

General Economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

VAR: Seductive but Dangerous

Tanya Styblo Beder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v51.n5.1932

1995-09-01

Financial Analysts Journal

Abstract:Value at risk (VAR) has gained rapid acceptance as a valuable approach to risk management. Not all VARs are equal, however. A study of VAR techniques used by dealers and end-users reveals that VAR calculations differ significantly for the same portfolio. VARs are extremely dependent on parameters, data, assumptions, and methodology. Calculation of eight common VARs for three hypothetical portfolios demonstrates the potentially seductive but dangerous nature of any single approach to risk management. In sum, although VAR and other quantitative techniques are necessary aspects of an effective risk-management program, they are not sufficient to control risk.

business, finance
VAR and Stress Tests: The Impact of Fat-Tail Risk and Systemic Risk on Commercial Banks in Hong Kong and China

Jacky Yuk-chow So,Tony U

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2996297

2017-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This study shows that the statistical property of the commercial banks’ rate of returns can be used to explain the resistance to using Value-at-risk (VaR) and stress tests to determine banks’ capital adequacy. We showed that “fat-tail” risk requires more capital than the “normal tail” risk estimated by VaR, which assumes normal distribution. The puzzle that most banks in Europe and Asia maintained higher capital levels than required by regulators before the 2008 financial crisis can be reinterpreted as rational action to protect financial companies against abnormal fat-tail risk, which may reflect inside information, such as off-balance sheet activities, rather than regulations. Micro- and macro-prudential policies are needed not only to discourage fat-tail risk seeking, but also to cover the higher social costs caused by higher systemic risk and bank diversification, which are affected by the heaviness of the tail and limited liability of bank charter.
Positive XVAs

Stéphane Crépey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/fmf.2022003

2022-01-01

Frontiers of Mathematical Finance

Abstract:Since the 2008 crisis, derivative dealers charge to their clients various add-ons, dubbed XVAs, meant to account for counterparty risk and its capital and funding implications. As banks cannot replicate jump-to-default related cash flows, deals trigger wealth transfers and shareholders need to set capital at risk. We devise an XVA policy, whereby so called contra-liabilities and cost of capital are sourced from bank clients at trade inceptions, on top of the fair valuation of counterparty risk, in order to guarantee to the shareholders a hurdle rate \begin{document}$ h $\end{document} on their capital at risk. The resulting all-inclusive XVA formula reads ( \begin{document}$ {{{\rm{CVA}}} }+{{{\rm{FVA}}}}+{{{\rm{KVA}}}} $\end{document} ), where C sits for credit, F for funding, and where the KVA is a cost of capital risk premium. All these XVA metrics are portfolio-wide, nonnegative and, despite the fact that we include the default of the bank itself in our modeling, they are ultimately unilateral. This makes them naturally in line with the requirement that capital at risk and reserve capital should not decrease simply because the credit risk of the bank has worsened. An application of this approach to a dealer bank reveals, in particular, the XVA implications of the centrally cleared hedging side of the derivative portfolio of the bank.
Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk

Phhilippe Jorion

Abstract:Since its original publication, Value at Risk has become the industry standard in risk management. Now in its Third Edition, this international bestseller addresses the fundamental changes in the field that have occurred across the globe in recent years. Philippe Jorion provides the most current information needed to understand and implement VAR-as well as manage newer dimensions of financial risk. Featured updates include: An increased emphasis on operational risk Using VAR for integrated risk management and to measure economic capital Applications of VAR to risk budgeting in investment management Discussion of new risk-management techniques, including extreme value theory, principal components, and copulas Extensive coverage of the recently finalized Basel II capital adequacy rules for commercial banks, integrated throughout the book A major new feature of the Third Edition is the addition of short questions and exercises at the end of each chapter, making it even easier to check progress. Detailed answers are posted on the companion web site www.pjorion.com/var/. The web site contains other materials, including additional questions that course instructors can assign to their students. Jorion leaves no stone unturned, addressing the building blocks of VAR from computing and backtesting models to forecasting risk and correlations. He outlines the use of VAR to measure and control risk for trading, for investment management, and for enterprise-wide risk management. He also points out key pitfalls to watch out for in risk-management systems. The value-at-risk approach continues to improve worldwide standards for managing numerous types of risk. Now more than ever, professionals can depend on Value at Risk for comprehensive, authoritative counsel on VAR, its application, and its results-and to keep ahead of the curve.

Business,Economics
Conditional Tail-Related Risk Estimation Using Composite Asymmetric Least Squares and Empirical Likelihood

Sheng Wu,Yi Zhang,Jun Zhao,Liming Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1807.01666

2018-01-01

Abstract:In this article, by using composite asymmetric least squares (CALS) and empirical likelihood, we propose a two-step procedure to estimate the conditional value at risk (VaR) and conditional expected shortfall (ES) for the GARCH series. First, we perform asymmetric least square regressions at several significance levels to model the volatility structure and separate it from the innovation process in the GARCH model. Note that expectile can serve as a bond to make up the gap from VaR estimation to ES estimation because there exists a bijective mapping from expectiles to specific quantile, and ES can be induced by expectile through a simple formula. Then, we introduce the empirical likelihood method to determine the relation above; this method is data-driven and distribution-free. Theoretical studies guarantee the asymptotic properties, such as consistency and the asymptotic normal distribution of the estimator obtained by our proposed method. A Monte Carlo experiment and an empirical application are conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. The results indicate that our proposed estimation method is competitive with some alternative existing tail-related risk estimation methods.
Relevance of Wrong-Way Risk in Funding Valuation Adjustments

T. van der Zwaard,L.A. Grzelak,C.W. Oosterlee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103091

2022-06-16

Abstract:In March 2020, the world was thrown into financial distress. This manifested itself in increased uncertainty in the financial markets. Many interest rates collapsed, and funding spreads surged significantly, which increased due to the market turmoil. In light of these events, it is essential to understand and model Wrong-Way Risk (WWR) in a Funding Valuation Adjustment (FVA) context. WWR may currently be absent from FVA calculations in banks' Valuation Adjustment (xVA) engines. However, in this letter, we demonstrate that WWR effects are non-negligible in FVA modelling from a risk-management perspective. We look at the impact of various modelling choices, such as including the default times of the relevant parties, as well as stochastic and deterministic funding spreads. A case study is presented for interest rate derivatives.

Computational Finance,Risk Management
Dynamic volatility regulation of financial institutions

Jens Hilscher,Alon Raviv,Zvi Wiener

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104968

IF: 9.848

2024-01-19

Finance Research Letters

Abstract:Unlike non-financial firms, financial institutions are often heavily regulated to prevent bankruptcies and negative spillovers. A main regulatory tool is risk-based capital requirements. To reflect this reality, we develop a model that allows for dynamically updated asset risk, in contrast to standard contingent claim models that assume constant volatility. Regulators impose a decrease in asset volatility when the capital cushion becomes small, thereby reducing the risk of distress. We show that such regulation of financial institutions affects their credit spreads, credit ratings, transition matrices, valuation of liabilities, cost of deposit insurance, and risk-shifting incentives.

business, finance
Capital requirements and claims recovery: A new perspective on solvency regulation

Cosimo Munari,Stefan Weber,Lutz Wilhelmy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12405

2022-10-09

Abstract:Protection of creditors is a key objective of financial regulation. Where the protection needs are high, that is, in banking and insurance, regulatory solvency requirements are an instrument to prevent that creditors incur losses on their claims. The current regulatory requirements based on value at risk (V@R) and average value at risk (AV@R) limit the probability of default of financial institutions, but they fail to control the size of recovery on creditors' claims in the case of default. We resolve this failure by developing a novel risk measure, recovery V@R. Our conceptual approach is flexible and allows the construction of general recovery risk measures for various risk management purposes. We provide detailed case studies and applications. We show that recovery risk measures can be used for performance‐based management of business divisions of firms and discuss how to calibrate recovery risk measures to historical regulatory standards. Finally, we analyze how recovery risk measures react to the joint distributions of assets and liabilities on firms' balance sheets and compare the corresponding capital requirements with the current regulatory benchmarks based on V@R and AV@R.

economics,business, finance
Operational risk modeled analytically II: the consequences of classification invariance

Vivien Brunel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1504.07805

2015-04-29

Risk Management

Abstract:Most of the banks' operational risk internal models are based on loss pooling in risk and business line categories. The parameters and outputs of operational risk models are sensitive to the pooling of the data and the choice of the risk classification. In a simple model, we establish the link between the number of risk cells and the model parameters by requiring invariance of the bank's loss distribution upon a change in classification. We provide details on the impact of this requirement on the domain of attraction of the loss distribution, on diversification effects and on cell risk correlations.
Some properties of Euler capital allocation

Lars Holden

2024-05-02

Abstract:The paper discusses capital allocation using the Euler formula and focuses on the risk measures Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Expected shortfall (ES). Some new results connected to this capital allocation is known. Two examples illustrate that capital allocation with VaR is not monotonous which may be surprising since VaR is monotonous. A third example illustrates why the same risk measure should be used in capital allocation as in the evaluation of the total portfolio. We show how simulation may be used in order to estimate the expected Return on risk adjusted capital in the commitment period of an asset. Finally, we show how Markov chain Monte Carlo may be used in the estimation of the capital allocation.

Risk Management,Probability,Portfolio Management
Multivariate Shortfall Risk Allocation and Systemic Risk

Yannick Armenti,Stephane Crepey,Samuel Drapeau,Antonis Papapantoleon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1507.05351

2017-03-23

Abstract:The ongoing concern about systemic risk since the outburst of the global financial crisis has highlighted the need for risk measures at the level of sets of interconnected financial components, such as portfolios, institutions or members of clearing houses. The two main issues in systemic risk measurement are the computation of an overall reserve level and its allocation to the different components according to their systemic relevance. We develop here a pragmatic approach to systemic risk measurement and allocation based on multivariate shortfall risk measures, where acceptable allocations are first computed and then aggregated so as to minimize costs. We analyze the sensitivity of the risk allocations to various factors and highlight its relevance as an indicator of systemic risk. In particular, we study the interplay between the loss function and the dependence structure of the components. Moreover, we address the computational aspects of risk allocation. Finally, we apply this methodology to the allocation of the default fund of a CCP on real data.

Risk Management,Probability
An extreme value approach to CoVaR estimation

Natalia Nolde,Chen Zhou,Menglin Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.00892

2022-01-03

Statistics Theory

Abstract:The global financial crisis of 2007-2009 highlighted the crucial role systemic risk plays in ensuring stability of financial markets. Accurate assessment of systemic risk would enable regulators to introduce suitable policies to mitigate the risk as well as allow individual institutions to monitor their vulnerability to market movements. One popular measure of systemic risk is the conditional value-at-risk (CoVaR), proposed in Adrian and Brunnermeier (2011). We develop a methodology to estimate CoVaR semi-parametrically within the framework of multivariate extreme value theory. According to its definition, CoVaR can be viewed as a high quantile of the conditional distribution of one institution's (or the financial system) potential loss, where the conditioning event corresponds to having large losses in the financial system (or the given financial institution). We relate this conditional distribution to the tail dependence function between the system and the institution, then use parametric modelling of the tail dependence function to address data sparsity in the joint tail regions. We prove consistency of the proposed estimator, and illustrate its performance via simulation studies and a real data example.
Disentangling price, risk and model risk: V&R measures

Marco Frittelli,Marco Maggis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-017-0202-3

2017-10-14

Mathematics and Financial Economics

Abstract:We propose a method to assess the intrinsic risk carried by a financial position X when the agent faces uncertainty about the pricing rule assigning its present value. Our approach is inspired by a new interpretation of the quasiconvex duality in a Knightian setting, where a family of probability measures replaces the single reference probability and is then applied to value financial positions. Diametrically, our construction of Value and Risk measures is based on the selection of a basket of claims to test the reliability of models. We compare a random payoff X with a given class of derivatives written on X, and use these derivatives to “test” the pricing measures. We further introduce and study a general class of Value and Risk measures R(p,X,P)$$ R(p,X,\mathbb {P})$$ that describes the additional capital that is required to make X acceptable under a probability P$$\mathbb {P}$$ and given the initial price p paid to acquire X.

economics,social sciences, mathematical methods,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,business, finance
Robust XVA

Maxim Bichuch,Agostino Capponi,Stephan Sturm

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1808.04908

2020-02-23

Abstract:We introduce an arbitrage-free framework for robust valuation adjustments. An investor trades a credit default swap portfolio with a risky counterparty, and hedges credit risk by taking a position in defaultable bonds. The investor does not know the return rate of her counterparty's bond, but is confident that it lies within an uncertainty interval. We derive both upper and lower bounds for the XVA process of the portfolio, and show that these bounds may be recovered as solutions of nonlinear ordinary differential equations. The presence of collateralization and closeout payoffs leads to important differences with respect to classical credit risk valuation. The value of the super-replicating portfolio cannot be directly obtained by plugging one of the extremes of the uncertainty interval in the valuation equation, but rather depends on the relation between the XVA replicating portfolio and the close-out value throughout the life of the transaction. Our comparative statics analysis indicates that credit contagion has a nonlinear effect on the replication strategies and on the XVA.

Pricing of Securities
Concave risk measures in international capital regulation

Imre Kondor,Andras Szepessy,Tunde Ujvarosi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0307244

2003-07-10

Statistical Mechanics

Abstract:We show that some specific market risk measures implied by current international capital regulation (the Basel Accords and the Capital Adequacy Directive of the European Union) violate the obvious requirement of convexity in some regions in the space of portfolio weights.
Model Risk in Var Estimation: an Empirical Study

Jing Yao,Zhong-Fei Li,Kai W. Ng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s021962200600209x

2006-01-01

International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making

Abstract:This paper studies the model risk; the risk of selecting a model for estimating the Value-at-Risk (VaR). By considering four GARCH-type volatility processes exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA), generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH), exponential GARCH (EGARCH), and fractionally integrated GARCH (FIGARCH), we evaluate the performance of the estimated VaRs using statistical tests including the Kupiec's likelihood ratio (LR) test, the Christoffersen's LR test, the CHI (Christoffersen, Hahn, and Inoue) specification test, and the CHI nonnested test. The empirical study based on Shanghai Stock Exchange A Share Index indicates that both EGARCH and FIGARCH models perform much better than the other two in VaR computation and that the two CHI tests are more suitable for analyzing model risk.
Derivatives Risks as Costs in a One-Period Network Model

Dorinel Bastide,Stéphane Crépey,Samuel Drapeau,Mekonnen Tadese

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.03248

2022-02-15

Abstract:We present a one-period XVA model encompassing bilateral and centrally cleared trading in a unified framework with explicit formulas for most quantities at hand. We illustrate possible uses of this framework for running stress test exercises on a financial network from a clearing member's perspective or for optimizing the porting of the portfolio of a defaulted clearing member.

Risk Management
Handling model risk with XVAs

Cyril Bénézet,Stéphane Crépey

2024-08-28

Abstract:In this paper we revisit Burnett (2021) \& Burnett and Williams (2021)'s notion of hedging valuation adjustment (HVA), originally intended to deal with dynamic hedging frictions such as transaction costs, in the direction of model risk. The corresponding HVA reconciles a global fair valuation model with the local models used by the different desks of the bank. Model risk and dynamic hedging frictions indeed deserve a reserve, but a risk-adjusted one, so not only an HVA, but also a contribution to the KVA of the bank. The orders of magnitude of the effects involved suggest that local models should not so much be managed via reserves, as excluded altogether.

Pricing of Securities,Probability,Computational Finance
Value-at-Risk: The Effect of Autoregression in a Quantile Process

Khizar Qureshi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1605.04940

2016-03-06

Abstract:Value-at-Risk (VaR) is an institutional measure of risk favored by financial regulators. VaR may be interpreted as a quantile of future portfolio values conditional on the information available, where the most common quantile used is 95%. Here we demonstrate Conditional Autoregressive Value at Risk, first introduced by Engle, Manganelli (2001). CAViaR suggests that negative/positive returns are not i.i.d., and that there is significant autocorrelation. The model is tested using data from 1986- 1999 and 1999-2009 for GM, IBM, XOM, SPX, and then validated via the dynamic quantile test. Results suggest that the tails (upper/lower quantile) of a distribution of returns behave differently than the core.

Risk Management,Statistical Finance
Parameter uncertainty for integrated risk capital calculations based on normally distributed subrisks

Andreas Fröhlich,Annegret Weng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.01608

2017-04-06

Abstract:In this contribution we consider the overall risk given as the sum of random subrisks $\mathbf{X}_j$ in the context of value-at-risk (VaR) based risk calculations. If we assume that the undertaking knows the parametric distribution family subrisk $\mathbf{X}_j=\mathbf{X}_j(\theta_j)$, but does not know the true parameter vectors $\theta_j$, the undertaking faces parameter uncertainty. To assess the appropriateness of methods to model parameter uncertainty for risk capital calculation we consider a criterion introduced in the recent literature. According to this criterion, we demonstrate that, in general, appropriateness of a risk capital model for each subrisk does not imply appropriateness of the model on the aggregate level of the overall risk.\\ For the case where the overall risk is given by the sum of normally distributed subrisks we prove a theoretical result leading to an appropriate integrated risk capital model taking parameter uncertainty into account. Based on the theorem we develop a method improving the approximation of the required confidence level simultaneously for both - on the level of each subrisk as well as for the overall risk.

Risk Management

The VAR at Risk

VAR: Seductive but Dangerous

VAR and Stress Tests: The Impact of Fat-Tail Risk and Systemic Risk on Commercial Banks in Hong Kong and China

Positive XVAs

Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk

Conditional Tail-Related Risk Estimation Using Composite Asymmetric Least Squares and Empirical Likelihood

Relevance of Wrong-Way Risk in Funding Valuation Adjustments

Dynamic volatility regulation of financial institutions

Capital requirements and claims recovery: A new perspective on solvency regulation

Operational risk modeled analytically II: the consequences of classification invariance

Some properties of Euler capital allocation

Multivariate Shortfall Risk Allocation and Systemic Risk

An extreme value approach to CoVaR estimation

Disentangling price, risk and model risk: V&R measures

Robust XVA

Concave risk measures in international capital regulation

Model Risk in Var Estimation: an Empirical Study

Derivatives Risks as Costs in a One-Period Network Model

Handling model risk with XVAs

Value-at-Risk: The Effect of Autoregression in a Quantile Process

Parameter uncertainty for integrated risk capital calculations based on normally distributed subrisks