Social Mobility in India

A. Singh,A. Forcina,K. Muniyoor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.00447

2021-01-31

Abstract:Rapid rise in income inequality in India is a serious concern. While the emphasis is on inclusive growth, it seems difficult to tackle the problem without looking at the intricacies of the problem. Social mobility is one such important tool which helps in reaching the cause of the problem and focuses on bringing long term equality in the country. The purpose of this study is to examine the role of social background and education attainment in generating occupation mobility in the country. By applying an extended version of the RC association model to 68th round (2011-12) of the Employment and Unemployment Survey by the National Sample Survey Office of India, we found that the role of education is not important in generating occupation mobility in India, while social background plays a critical role in determining one's occupation. This study successfully highlights the strong intergenerational occupation immobility in the country and also the need to focus on education. In this regard, further studies are needed to uncover other crucial factors limiting the growth of individuals in the country.

General Economics,Applications

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to address the issue of social mobility in India, especially the inter - generational occupational mobility. Specifically, the research aims to explore the following aspects:

1. **The influence of social background and education on occupational mobility**: By analyzing the role of social background (such as father's occupation) and educational attainment in determining an individual's career choice, the study hopes to reveal whether there is a strong phenomenon of inter - generational occupational lock - in in India's current social structure.

2. **Whether education can promote occupational mobility**: The research attempts to assess whether education can effectively improve an individual's social status, that is, whether receiving a higher - level education is helpful for entering a higher - level occupation.

3. **The current situation of social mobility and its influencing factors**: The study also hopes to reveal the problems of social mobility existing in Indian society and the reasons behind them, and provide a basis for future policy - making.

### Research methods

To achieve the above - mentioned goals, the author used an extended version of the Row - Column (RC) association model and analyzed the data from the Employment and Unemployment Survey conducted by the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) in India in 2011 - 2012. This method can better capture the complex relationships among social background, education and occupation.

### Main findings

1. **Social background has a significant impact on career choice**: The study found that social background (such as father's occupation) plays a crucial role in determining an individual's career choice, while the role of education is relatively small. This indicates that there is a strong phenomenon of inter - generational occupational lock - in in India.

2. **Education has not significantly improved occupational mobility**: Although the educational level has increased, education has not significantly improved occupational mobility, especially in low - income groups, and this phenomenon is more obvious.

3. **The need to further focus on the quality of education**: The study emphasizes the importance of improving the quality of education in order to break the inter - generational occupational lock - in and promote social mobility.

### Conclusion

This study reveals the problem of inter - generational occupational lock - in existing in Indian society, and points out that although education is helpful to a certain extent in improving social status, its role is limited. Future research should further explore other factors that may limit individual development and put forward effective policy recommendations to promote social mobility.

### Formula presentation

The Row - Column (RC) association model mentioned in the paper can be represented by the following formula:

\[
\log \mu_{ij}=\lambda+\lambda_{i}^{X}+\lambda_{j}^{Y}+\theta x_{i}y_{j}
\]

where:
- $\mu_{ij}$ represents the expected frequency of the $i$-th row and the $j$-th column.
- $\lambda$ is the overall mean parameter.
- $\lambda_{i}^{X}$ and $\lambda_{j}^{Y}$ are the main effect parameters of rows and columns respectively.
- $\theta$ is the intrinsic correlation coefficient, representing the strength of the association between rows and columns.
- $x_{i}$ and $y_{j}$ are the scores of rows and columns respectively.

Through this model, researchers can quantify the influence of social background and education on career choice and evaluate the strength of the association between these factors.