Abstract:Automatic grading is not a new approach but the need to adapt the latest technology to automatic grading has become very important. As the technology has rapidly became more powerful on scoring exams and essays, especially from the 1990s onwards, partially or wholly automated grading systems using computational methods have evolved and have become a major area of research. In particular, the demand of scoring of natural language responses has created a need for tools that can be applied to automatically grade these responses. In this paper, we focus on the concept of automatic grading of short answer questions such as are typical in the UK GCSE system, and providing useful feedback on their answers to students. We present experimental results on a dataset provided from the introductory computer science class in the University of North Texas. We first apply standard data mining techniques to the corpus of student answers for the purpose of measuring similarity between the student answers and the model answer. This is based on the number of common words. We then evaluate the relation between these similarities and marks awarded by scorers. We consider an approach that groups student answers into clusters. Each cluster would be awarded the same mark, and the same feedback given to each answer in a cluster. In this manner, we demonstrate that clusters indicate the groups of students who are awarded the same or the similar scores. Words in each cluster are compared to show that clusters are constructed based on how many and which words of the model answer have been used. The main novelty in this paper is that we design a model to predict marks based on the similarities between the student answers and the model answer. We argue that computational methods be used to enhance the reliability of human scoring, and not replace it. Humans are required to calibrate the system, and to deal with situations that are challenging. Computational methods can provide insight into which student answers will be found challenging and thus be a place human judgement is required.

Mechanical TA 2: A System for Peer Grading with TA Support

Systematic Review of Approaches to Improve Peer Assessment at Scale

Methods for Ordinal Peer Grading

Enhanced Peer Assessment in MOOC Evaluation Through Assignment and Review Analysis

Grading Massive Open Online Courses Using Large Language Models

Tuned Models of Peer Assessment in MOOCs

CrowdGrader: Crowdsourcing the Evaluation of Homework Assignments

Engaging Software Engineering Students in Grading: The effects of peer assessment on self-evaluation, motivation, and study time

Towards Scalable Automated Grading: Leveraging Large Language Models for Conceptual Question Evaluation in Engineering

Development of a Web Platform for Code Peer-Testing

Automatic short answer grading and feedback using text mining methods

Physics graduate teaching assistants' beliefs about a grading rubric: Lessons learned

Peer assessment in a project-based engineering course: comparing between on-campus and online learning environments

Effects of a peer tutor recommender system (PTRS) with machine learning and automated assessment on vocational high school students' computer application operating skills

PeerBERT: Automated Characterization of Peer Review Comments across Courses

Forming a ranking from tied evaluations: a case of an online, interactive student peer assessment system

Program Equivalence for Assisted Grading of Functional Programs (Extended Version)

Large Language Models As MOOCs Graders

Physics postgraduate teaching assistants' grading approaches: Conflicting goals and practices

Responding to student feedback Individualising teamwork scores based on peer assessment

Teaching Python programming with automatic assessment and feedback provision