Abstract:Self-assembling cyclic peptide nanotubes can form nanopores when they are inserted in lipid bilayers, acting as ion and/or water permeable channels. In order to improve the versatility of these systems, it is possible to specifically design cyclic peptides with a combination of natural and non-natural amino acids, enabling the control of the nature of the inner cavity of the channels. Here, the behavior of two types of self-assembling peptide motifs, alternating α-amino acids with γ- or δ-aminocycloalkanecarboxylic acids, is studied via molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The behavior of water molecules in nanopores is expected to affect the properties of these channels and therefore merits detailed examination. A number of water models commonly used in MD simulations have been validated by how well they reproduce bulk water properties. However, it is less clear how these water models behave in the nanoconfined condition inside a channel. The behavior of four different water models—TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP4P/2005, and OPC—are evaluated in MD simulations of self-assembled cyclic peptide nanotubes of distinct composition and diameter. The dynamic behavior of the water molecules and ions in these designed artificial channels depends subtly on the water model used. TIP3P water molecules move faster than those of TIP4P, TIP4P/2005, and OPC. This demeanor is clearly observed in the filling of the nanotube, in water diffusion within the pore, and in the number and stability of hydrogen bonds of the peptides with water. It was also shown that the water model influences the simulated ion flux through the nanotubes, with TIP3P producing the greatest ion flux. Additionally, the two more recent models, TIP4P/2005 and OPC, which are known to reproduce the experimental self-diffusion coefficient of bulk water quite well, exhibit very similar results under the nanoconfined conditions studied here. Because none of these models have been parametrized specifically for waters confined in peptide nanotubes, this study provides a point of reference for further validation.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acsnano.1c00155?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.1c00155</a>.Additional analyses of simulations (RMSD, inner radius, z-coordinate for anions, etc.) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsnano.1c00155/suppl_file/nn1c00155_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Influence of water models on water movement through AQP1

A molecular understanding of the dynamic mechanism of aquaporin osmosis

Effect of channel wettability on the single‐file water transport in sub-nanometer channel

Functionality Determinants and Pore-level Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) Approach for Water Permeation Rate in Aquaporins

Impact of water models on structure and dynamics of enzyme tunnels

Prediction of Aquaporin Function by Integrating Evolutionary and Functional Analyses

Modeling thermodiffusion in aqueous sodium chloride solutions-Which water model is best?

Influence of the Water Model on the Structure and Interactions of the GPR40 Protein with the Lipid Membrane and the Solvent: Rigid versus Flexible Water Models

Molecular aspects of aquaporins

The Water Permeability and Pore Entrance Structure of Aquaporin-4 Depend on Lipid Bilayer Thickness

Molecular Biology of Aquaporins.

Effect of Water Models on Transmembrane Self-Assembled Cyclic Peptide Nanotubes

AQP4-independent TRPV4 modulation of plasma membrane water permeability

Analysis of aquaporin-mediated diffusional water permeability by coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering microscopy

Molecular mechanism of anion permeation through aquaporin 6

Multiscale simulation of surfactant–aquaporin complex formation and water permeability

Structure and Dynamics of Extracellular Loops in Human Aquaporin-1 from Solid-State NMR and Molecular Dynamics

Numerical Study of Pressure Response to Action Potential by Water Permeation With Ion Transports

Fast collective motions of backbone in transmembrane α helices are critical to water transfer of aquaporin

Salt parameterization can drastically affect the results from classical atomistic simulations of water desalination by MoS$_2$ nanopores