Re-examining the Role of Nuclear Fusion in a Renewables-Based Energy Mix

T. E. G. Nicholas,T. P. Davis,F. Federici,J. E. Leland,B. S. Patel,C.Vincent,S. H. Ward

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112043

2021-01-15

Abstract:Fusion energy is often regarded as a long-term solution to the world's energy needs. However, even after solving the critical research challenges, engineering and materials science will still impose significant constraints on the characteristics of a fusion power plant. Meanwhile, the global energy grid must transition to low-carbon sources by 2050 to prevent the worst effects of climate change. We review three factors affecting fusion's future trajectory: (1) the significant drop in the price of renewable energy, (2) the intermittency of renewable sources and implications for future energy grids, and (3) the recent proposition of intermediate-level nuclear waste as a product of fusion. Within the scenario assumed by our premises, we find that while there remains a clear motivation to develop fusion power plants, this motivation is likely weakened by the time they become available. We also conclude that most current fusion reactor designs do not take these factors into account and, to increase market penetration, fusion research should consider relaxed nuclear waste design criteria, raw material availability constraints and load-following designs with pulsed operation.

Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **The role and competitiveness of nuclear fusion energy in the future low - carbon energy structure, especially in the context of the rapid development of renewable energy**. Specifically, the paper explores the following aspects:

1. **Significant decline in the price of renewable energy**: As the cost of renewable energy (such as wind energy and solar energy) decreases rapidly, their proportion in the global energy structure will increase significantly. This makes nuclear fusion less economically attractive.

2. **Intermittency problem of renewable energy**: The supply of renewable energy is intermittent and unstable, which poses a challenge to the future power grid. Can nuclear fusion provide stable base - load power in this context, or is it necessary to develop a flexible load - following design to adapt to fluctuating power demands?

3. **Low - and medium - level radioactive waste generated by nuclear fusion**: The latest research shows that nuclear fusion reactors may generate a large amount of intermediate - level waste (ILW), which is inconsistent with the previous view that nuclear fusion will not produce long - term radioactive waste. This finding has questioned the environmental advantages of nuclear fusion.

4. **Market and technological competition**: By the middle of this century, the global energy structure will be mainly composed of low - carbon energy, and nuclear fusion will face competition from other low - carbon energy technologies (such as advanced fission reactors, natural gas power generation with carbon capture and storage). How can nuclear fusion stand out in these competitions?

### Main conclusions of the paper

- **Weakened motivation for nuclear fusion**: Although the motivation for developing nuclear fusion still exists, when nuclear fusion technology matures, its market demand may have been weakened due to the development of renewable energy.

- **Existing designs do not fully consider future needs**: At present, most designs of nuclear fusion reactors do not fully consider the above factors, especially the treatment of intermediate - level radioactive waste, the availability of raw materials, and the need for load - following designs.

- **Suggestion to adjust the research direction**: In order to increase the market penetration of nuclear fusion in the future, research should consider relaxing the requirements for nuclear waste design standards, considering the availability limitations of raw materials, and developing a load - following design that can flexibly adjust the output power.

### Formula explanation

A key formula involved in the paper is the calculation of the Energy Return on Investment (EROI):

\[
\text{EROI}=\frac{\text{Energy Generated}}{\text{Energy Invested}}=\frac{P t_L}{M t_L + F P t_L+I}
\]

where:
- \(P\) is the reactor output power.
- \(t_L\) is the power plant life.
- \(M\) is the maintenance energy consumption cost per unit time.
- \(F\) is the fuel mining and production energy consumption cost per unit of available output energy.
- \(I\) is the one - time energy consumption cost of building and decommissioning power plant infrastructure.
- \(\text{EROI}_F = \frac{1}{F}\) is the Energy Return on Investment of the fuel itself.

This formula shows that even if the Energy Return on Investment of the fuel is infinitely large, the overall EROI of the system is still limited by other factors, such as maintenance and construction costs.

Through these analyses, the paper aims to re - evaluate the role of nuclear fusion in the future energy structure and put forward corresponding improvement suggestions.