Abstract:Introduction: The subjective perception of solid bolus hold up during swallowing is a common reason for referral for manometric investigation, yet standard measures of esophageal function relate poorly to patient perception and a large proportion of patients with dysphagia demonstrate no apparent abnormality on routine diagnostic testing for esophageal dysfunction.The utility of combined esophageal pressure-impedance recording has been recently enhanced by automated impedance manometry pressure-flow analysis (AIM analysis) and new metrics have been conceived that better describe the interactions between bolus transport and pressure generation.In this study we undertook to assess whether these new esophageal pressure-flow metrics were altered when subjects perceived solid bolus hold up.Methods: Esophageal high-resolution pressure-impedance recordings of 5ml/10ml liquid/viscous swallows and 2cm/4cm solid swallows from 20 control subjects (29-73 years) were analysed.Two solid state pressure(P)/impedance(Z) catheter configurations were used; 32 1cm P/16 2cm Z (Sandhill Scientific) and 36 1cm P/18 2cm Z (Given Imaging).Bolus flow resistance, the relationship between bolus compression and bolus flow timing, was assessed using the pressure flow index (PFI) (Myers et al Neurogastro.Mot.2012; Nguyen et al Neurogastro.Mot.2012).Heightened perception of bolus hold up was assessed on a swallow by swallow basis using a 6 point scale (1 = no perception, 2 = awareness of bolus transit, 3-6 = bolus hold up).Results: On a swallow by swallow analysis, heightened perception of solid boluses (swallows with scores 3+) was associated with a higher PFI (distal esophagus Odds Ratio for score 3+ 1.001 [1.000 1.002], p = 0.021).A significant correlation was observed between the maximum subject reported perception score and the average PFI for solids (distal esophagus Pearson's r = 0.690, p,0.001).Grouping of subjects in relation to bolus perception revealed that the PFI was elevated for solids and viscous boluses, but not liquids, in subjects reporting bolus hold up (Figure).Esophageal peak pressures and iso-contour defect size were not significantly related to bolus perception.Conclusion: We report novel findings in relation to mechanical factors during bolus transport that may enhance bolus perception.This study shows that heightened perception of a swallowed bolus relates to subtle differences in flow resistance, which suggests higher levels of muscle tension during the transition phase from a bolus-containing to a lumen-occluded esophageal segment.

Evaluation of the Whiteout During Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing and Examination of Its Correlation with Pharyngeal Residue and Aspiration

The Differences in the Esophageal Motility Between Liquid and Solid Bolus Swallows: A Multicenter High-Resolution Manometry Study in Chinese Asymptomatic Volunteers

Cross-sectional study on dysphagia evaluation in community-dwelling older adults using the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT)-10, EAT-2, and Water Swallow Test

Normal values for swallow events during endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: a preliminary study

Preliminary Normative Reference Values of Validated FEES Scales in Healthy Young Adults

Profile of oropharyngeal swallowing in healthy Brazilian adults and older adults

Bedside Clinical Swallow Test and the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallow - Level of Agreement

Pharyngeal Residue Scoring in Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: Reliability Comparison and Applicability Among Different Scales

Pharyngeal phase of swallowing in post-stroke dysphagia: videoendoscopy and speech-language-hearing assessment

Findings of a videofluoroscopic swallowing study in patients with dysphagia

Swallowing Characteristics and Water Swallow Capacity in Patients with Parkinsonism

Fiber-optic Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing in Acnte Stroke Patients

Post-extubation Dysphagia: Does Timing of Evaluation Matter?

Role of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in children with suspected dysphagia

Reliability and Construct Validity of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale: Performance on Videos and Effect of Bolus Consistency

Relationship between Swallowing Pressure and Saliva Residue on Endoscopic Evaluation in Pharyngeal Dysphagia

Prevention of White Flocculate Precipitation with Simethicone During Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Double‐Blinded, Multi‐Center, Randomized Study

Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study Features and Resting-State Functional MRI Brain Activity for Assessing Swallowing Differences in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Risk of Dysphagia

531 Systematic Endoscopic Surveillance in a High-Risk Cohort is Feasible for the Detection of Early Gastric Neoplasia

Quantifying Oropharyngeal Swallowing Impairment in Response to Bolus Viscosity

Understanding user experience and normative data in pharyngeal residue rating scales used in flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES): A scoping review