Bicuspid valve CT registry of balloon‐expandable TAVR: BETTER TAVR registry

Jorge Chavarria,Felipe Falcao,Hatim AlRaddadi,Amir Aziz,Alexander Dick,Kevin Chung,David Meier,Janar Sathananthan,Noman Ali,Kevin John Um,James Velianou,Madhu Natarajan,Iqbal Jaffer,David Wood,Neil Fam,Tej Sheth
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31091
IF: 2.3
2024-06-01
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Abstract:Background The anatomic substrate of bicuspid valves may lead to suboptimal TAVR stent expansion and geometry. Aim We evaluated determinants of stent geometry in bicuspid valves treated with Sapien transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) valves. Methods A multicenter retrospective registry of patients (February 2019 to August 2022) who underwent post‐TAVR computed tomography to determine stent area (vs. nominal valve area) and stent ellipticity (maximum diameter/minimum diameter). Predictors of relative stent expansion (minimum area/average of inflow + outflow area) and stent ellipticity were evaluated in a multivariable regression model, including valve calcium volume (indexed by annular area), presence of raphe calcium, sinus diameters indexed by area‐derived annular diameter, and performance of pre‐dilation and post‐dilation. Results The registry enrolled 101 patients from four centers. The minimum stent area (vs. nominal area) was 88.1%, and the maximum ellipticity was 1.10, with both observed near the midframe of the valve in all cases. Relative stent expansion ≥90% was observed in 64/101 patients. The only significant predictor of relative stent expansion ≥90% was the performance of post‐dilation (OR: 4.79, p = 0.018). Relative stent expansion ≥90% was seen in 86% of patients with post‐dilation compared to 57% without (p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?