The evaluation study for social cognition measures in Japan: Psychometric properties, relationships with social function, and recommendations
Hisashi Akiyama,Ryo Okubo,Atsuhito Toyomaki,Akane Miyazaki,Sachiko Hattori,Mariko Nohara,Yohei Sasaki,Ryotaro Kubota,Hiroki Okano,Kanami Takahashi,Yumi Hasegawa,Izumi Wada,Takashi Uchino,Kazuyoshi Takeda,Satoru Ikezawa,Takahiro Nemoto,Yoichi M Ito,Naoki Hashimoto,Yoichi M. Ito
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104003
IF: 13.89
2024-05-01
Asian Journal of Psychiatry
Abstract:AIM: Patients with schizophrenia can have significant subjective difficulties in social cognition, but few undergo testing or treatment for social cognition. The Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation (SCOPE) study recommends six social cognitive measures; however, the reliability and validity of these measures in different cultural and linguistic areas has not been adequately examined. We examined the psychometric properties of nine social cognitive measures and the relationship to social function, with the aim of determining the level of recommendation for social cognitive measures in clinical practice in Japan.METHODS: For our test battery, an expert panel previously selected nine measures: the Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task (BLERT); Facial Emotion Selection Test (FEST); Hinting Task (Hinting); Metaphor and Sarcasm Scenario Test (MSST); Intentionality Bias Task (IBT); Ambiguous Intentions and Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ); Social Attribution Task-Multiple Choice (SAT-MC); SAT-MCII; and Biological Motion (BM) task. In total, 121 outpatients with schizophrenia and 70 healthy controls were included in the analysis, and the results were provided to an expert panel to determine the recommendations for each measure. The quantitative psychological indices of each measure were evaluated for practicality, tolerability, test-retest reliability, correlation with social function, and the incremental validity of social function.RESULTS: Hinting and FEST received the highest recommendations for use in screening, severity assessment, and longitudinal assessment, followed by BLERT, MSST AIHQ, SAT-MC, and SAT-MCII, with IBT and BM receiving the lowest recommendations.CONCLUSION: This study provides a uniform assessment tool that can be used in future international clinical trials for social cognitive impairment.
psychiatry