Abstract:This paper joins the non-point source pollution regulation discussion and examines whether economic incentives provided by crop insurance subsidies alter fertilizer application decisions in the direction with environmental benefits. The model predicts that farmers regularly apply more fertilizer than optimal in a given year to take advantage of yield gains in the few years with favorable weather conditions, and that the long-term optimal fertilizer application level reduces with crop insurance, thus creating environmental externalities. Intuitively, farmers use “insurance application” of fertilizer at their own full expenses to achieve exceptional good yields and profits to make up for losses in bad years to sustain long-term profitability. With insurance covering the loss in very bad years, such incentive is reduced, resulting in a reduced the long-term optimal fertilizer level. Empirically, this study finds that a reduction in fertilizer use was achieved in the search of reducing systemic production risk in agriculture via crop insurance. An Instrumental variable (IV) approach was used taking advantage of the exogenous shocks on crop insurance enrollment induced by Federal Crop Insurance Reform Act (FCIRA) of 1994 and the differential response to the policy due to past extreme heat shocks. The study finds that counties in the Corn Belt where cropland is dominated by corn and soybean production showed an 18.5% decrease in commercial nitrogen (N) fertilizer use. No significant change in phosphorus (P) fertilizer application was found. The difference in behavior responses between N and P is expected and can be explained by the natural process of N and P in the soil and history of nutrients management in the Corn Belt. These findings suggest that public programs that alters economic incentives can have significant knock-on effects on agricultural non-point source pollution. Further, effective design of economic incentive programs in regulating agricultural NPS pollution should be rooted in understanding natural process of the pollutants in the ecosystem. More broadly, policy targeting the same population, regardless of the designed purpose of the programs, should be considered when predicting policy outcomes.

Optimal Levels of Fertilization Under Risk: The Potential for Corn and Wheat Fertilization Under Alternative Price Policies in Argentina

How do price (risk) changes influence farmers' preferences to reduce fertilizer application?

Optimal Sequential Plantings of Corn and Soybeans Under Price Uncertainty

Evaluating the impact of rising fertilizer prices on crop yields

An Assessment of Planting Flexibility Options to Reduce the Excessive Application of Nitrogen Fertilizer in the United States of America

Exploring Trade-Offs Between Profit, Yield, and the Environmental Footprint of Potential Nitrogen Fertilizer Regulations in the US Midwest

Survey based assessment of sustainable agricultural practices: Evidence from Indian plots

Economic Analysis of Spatial‐Temporal Patterns in Corn and Soybean Response to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

What Works for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Reduction? Evidence from the Corn Belt in the United States

Estimating the risk of groundwater contamination and environmental impact of pesticides in an agricultural basin in Argentina

Predicting site-specific economic optimal nitrogen rate using machine learning methods and on-farm precision experimentation

Managing colombian farmers price risk exposure with electrical derivatives market

Cost-benefit analysis across smallholder rice farmers reveals that existing fertilization practices severely compromise their income

Yield potential determines Australian wheat growers’ capacity to close yield gaps while mitigating economic risk

Case Study on the Economic and Environmental Impact of the Introduction of the Variable-Rate Distribution of Fertilizer in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivation

Optimal crop planting schedules and financial hedging strategies under ENSO-based climate forecasts

Potential Economic Benefits of Modifications to Urea That Increase Yield through Reduction in Nitrogen Losses

Integrated valuation of alternative land use scenarios in the agricultural ecosystem of a watershed with limited available data, in the Pampas region of Argentina

Economic analysis of crop protection strategies: comparing the value of increased fungicide inputs and crop genetic improvement in managing Ascochyta blight in Australian chickpeas

Crop Productivity and Economics during the Transition to Alternative Cropping Systems

Socially Beneficial Rationality: The Value of Strategic Farmers, Social Entrepreneurs, and For-Profit Firms in Crop Planting Decisions