Abstract:BackgroundCurrent primary prevention guidelines for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prioritize risk identification, risk stratification using clinical and risk scores, and risk reduction with lifestyle interventions and pharmacotherapy. Subclinical atherosclerosis is an early indicator of atherosclerotic burden and its timely recognition can slow or prevent progression to CVD. Thus, individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis are a priority for primary prevention. This study takes a practical approach to answering a challenge commonly faced by primary care practitioners: in patients with no known CVD, how can individuals likely to have subclinical atherosclerosis be easily identified using existing clinical data and/or information provided by the patient?MethodsUsing NHANES (1999–2004), 6091 men and women aged ≥40 years without any CVD comprised the primary prevention population for this study. Subclinical atherosclerosis was determined via ankle-brachial index (ABI) using established cutoffs (subclinical atherosclerosis defined as ABI (0.91–0.99); normal defined as ABI (1.00–1.30)). Three common scores were calculated: the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), the Metabolic Syndrome (MetS), and the Cardiovascular Health Index (CVHI). Logistic regression analysis assessed the association between these scores and subclinical atherosclerosis. The sensitively and specificity of these scores in identifying subclinical atherosclerosis was determined.ResultsIn eligible participants, 3.8% had subclinical atherosclerosis. Optimum and average CVHI was associated with decreased odds for subclinical atherosclerosis. High, but not intermediate-risk, FRS was associated with increased odds for subclinical atherosclerosis. MetS was not associated with subclinical atherosclerosis. Of the 3 scores, CVHI was the most sensitive in identifying subclinical atherosclerosis and had the lowest number of missed cases. The FRS was the most specific but least sensitive of the 3 scores, and had almost 10-fold more missed cases vs. the CVHI. The MetS had “middle” sensitivity and specificity, and 10-fold more missed cases vs. the CVHI.ConclusionsResults from this study suggest that routine administration of the CVHI in a primary prevention population would yield the benefits of identifying patients with existing subclinical CVD not identified through traditional CVD risk factors or scores, and bring physical activity and nutrition to the forefront of provider-patient discussions about lifestyle factors critical to maintaining and prolonging cardiovascular health.

Screening for cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic patients

The art of cardiovascular risk assessment

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Tools in Non-Western Populations

The Screening Value of Bapwv and Hs-Crp to ASCVD in Middle and Elderly Community Population in Shanghai

Early Screening Models for High Risk Population of Cardiovascular Disease

2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task …

Improving coronary heart disease risk assessment in asymptomatic people: role of traditional risk factors and noninvasive cardiovascular tests

Why and when to screen for cardiovascular disease in healthy individuals

CT-based cardiovascular risk stratification benefits in asymptomatic patients

De-risking primary prevention: role of imaging

Assessing Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Responses to Preventive Therapies in Clinical Practice

Subclinical atherosclerosis, cardiovascular health, and disease risk: is there a case for the Cardiovascular Health Index in the primary prevention population?

Cardiovascular Health Score and Lifetime Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

Universal Risk Prediction for Individuals With and Without Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Risk estimation for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: considerations for appropriate risk prediction model selection

Cardiovascular Imaging for the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Events

Current and Future Directions of Cardiovascular Risk Prediction

Interplay of coronary artery calcification and traditional risk factors for the prediction of all-cause mortality in asymptomatic individuals

Traditional SCORE-based health check fails to identify individuals who develop acute myocardial infarction

Cardiovascular Health Score and Lifetime Risk of Cardiovascular Disease The Cardiovascular Lifetime Risk Pooling Project