Abstract:Simple Summary As dogs evolve to fill a new and increased number of roles in human societies, it is critical that we understand how they communicate with people. Here, we investigate whether markings on dogs’ faces influence how expressive they are perceived to be by humans. Using standardized systems to analyze dogs’ facial complexity and behaviors, we find that dogs with plainer faces (fewer markings) objectively score as more behaviorally expressive. Age and skill or training level also impact expressivity, with adult dogs being more expressive than senior dogs and dogs that are highly skilled being more expressive than those who have had no training or working experience. Interestingly, dogs tend to use their face more “wholistically” during highly social interactions with owners than when presented with ambiguous cues, and owners of adult dogs with plainer faces tend to be more accurate at judging their dog’s expressivity. These data are important to consider as the human–dog relationship continues to develop, both from an evolutionary perspective and especially in the context of canine training and welfare. Abstract Facial phenotypes are significant in communication with conspecifics among social primates. Less is understood about the impact of such markers in heterospecific encounters. Through behavioral and physical phenotype analyses of domesticated dogs living in human households, this study aims to evaluate the potential impact of superficial facial markings on dogs’ production of human-directed facial expressions. That is, this study explores how facial markings, such as eyebrows, patches, and widow’s peaks, are related to expressivity toward humans. We used the Dog Facial Action Coding System (DogFACS) as an objective measure of expressivity, and we developed an original schematic for a standardized coding of facial patterns and coloration on a sample of more than 100 male and female dogs (N = 103), aged from 6 months to 12 years, representing eight breed groups. The present study found a statistically significant, though weak, correlation between expression rate and facial complexity, with dogs with plainer faces tending to be more expressive (r = −0.326, p ≤ 0.001). Interestingly, for adult dogs, human companions characterized dogs’ rates of facial expressivity with more accuracy for dogs with plainer faces. Especially relevant to interspecies communication and cooperation, within-subject analyses revealed that dogs’ muscle movements were distributed more evenly across their facial regions in a highly social test condition compared to conditions in which they received ambiguous cues from their owners. On the whole, this study provides an original evaluation of how facial features may impact communication in human–dog interactions.

Evolutionary divergence of facial muscle physiology between domestic dogs and wolves

Evolution of facial muscle anatomy in dogs

Raising an Eye at Facial Muscle Morphology in Canids

Coyotes can do 'puppy dog eyes' too: comparing interspecific variation in Canis facial expression muscles

Domestication constrains the ability of dogs to convey emotions via facial expressions in comparison to their wolf ancestors

Comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the role of the neural crest in dog domestication

Evolutionary consequences of domestication on the selective effects of new amino acid changing mutations in canids

Genome-wide SNP and Haplotype Analyses Reveal a Rich History Underlying Dog Domestication

Grey wolf genomic history reveals a dual ancestry of dogs

Structural variation during dog domestication: insights from gray wolf and dhole genomes

Genome Sequencing Highlights Genes Under Selection and the Dynamic Early History of Dogs

Adaptations to sociality in the mimetic and auricular musculature of the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus)

What Is Written on a Dog’s Face? Evaluating the Impact of Facial Phenotypes on Communication between Humans and Canines

Worldwide Patterns of Genomic Variation and Admixture in Gray Wolves

Dog Domestication Strongly Relied on Translation Regulation According to Differential Gene Expression Analysis

Morphology does not covary with predicted behavioral correlations of the domestication syndrome in dogs

The Genomics of Selection in Dogs and the Parallel Evolution Between Dogs and Humans

Genetic and anatomical determinants of olfaction in dogs and wild canids

Domestication of the Dog from the Wolf Was Promoted by Enhanced Excitatory Synaptic Plasticity: A Hypothesis

A first exploratory comparison of the behaviour of wolves (Canis lupus) and wolf-dog hybrids in captivity

Artificial Selection on Brain-Expressed Genes During the Domestication of Dog.