Neonatal pain assessment in Sweden - a fifteen-year follow up

Maria Gradin,Mats Eriksson,NeoOpioid investigators group,H Lagercrantz,A Rane,L L Bergqvist,L Hellström-Westas,V Fellman,M Eriksson,J Schollin,R van Shaik,A Soetemont,J-P Osselaere,S Andersson,G Menon,R Carbajal,B van Overmeire,M Keller,E Boyle,K J S Anand
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01996.x
Abstract:Background: It has been proposed that a systematic pain assessment increases the awareness of the need to treat and prevent pain, and most international and national neonatal pain guidelines state that pain assessment should be performed in a systematic way. National surveys show a wide variation in compliance to these guidelines. Methods: A survey to all Swedish neonatal units was performed in 1993, 1998, 2003 and 2008, concerning the use of, and need for, pain assessment tools. Results: The number of units that tried to assess pain increased from 64% in 1993 to 83% in 2008. Forty-four per cent of these used a structured method in 2003, compared to three per cent in 1998. The most common pain indicator was facial actions. Conclusion: The proportion of neonatal units that reported the use of a structured pain assessment tool has increased significantly from 1993 to 2008. There is a need for better evidence for the relation between the implementation of pain guidelines and the actual performance of pain assessment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?